MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there any standard way to read (in English) the Legendre symbol (a|p) (, say, similar to "a choose b" which is used for the binomial coefficients?

share|cite|improve this question
I wouldn't mind knowing how this is read in other languages, by the way :) – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Feb 16 '10 at 15:02
I am almost certain that the answer to your question is "no", and for everyone that posts an answer saying "well I say it this way" this is in some sense more evidence that the answer really is "no". Isn't that strange? – Kevin Buzzard Feb 16 '10 at 15:23
I think Kevin is correct. (As for myself, I say "the Legendre symbol of a with respect to p", because I don't know what else one is suppose to say.) – Emerton Feb 16 '10 at 15:34
Mariano: In German,(a|b) is read "a nach b", according to a German mathematician who asked me the original question. – Keivan Karai Feb 16 '10 at 16:02
up vote 13 down vote accepted

I say "a on b" for the Legendre/Jacobi/Kronecker symbol. This works because, as an American, I say "a over b" for an ordinary fraction.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for the quick answer! – Keivan Karai Feb 16 '10 at 14:27
I don't think I have ever heard anyone in English say anything other than "a on p" for (a|p) when trying to read the symbol. Perhaps they've said something more involved like "the Legendre symbol with denominator p" for the function (*|p). – KConrad Feb 16 '10 at 21:43
Really? Everyone says "a on p"? I think I usually still just say "a over p" for the Legendre symbol (at the board), sometimes prefaced by "the Legendre symbol." – Kimball Jun 15 '11 at 0:34

I use "a legendre b" for the Legendre symbol. I know this is probably not very common and a bit idiosyncratic but I think it is quite clear.

share|cite|improve this answer

I recently started using "QR a b"

share|cite|improve this answer
To use this in the statement of quadratic reciprocity, you'd have to talk about QR $p$ $q$ and QR $q$ $p$, which don't sound good to me. (An issue that came up in my thesis: If $\ell$ and $p$ are already taken for primes, and $q$ is already taken for a prime power, what is the notation for anotheer prime?) – L Spice Jun 14 '11 at 22:07

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.