MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to prove a version of quantum Schur-Weyl duality. I hope to be able to generalize the proof of the Schur-Weyl duality between $U_q(\mathfrak{gl}_n)$ and the Hecke algebra $H_r$. So I am looking for a good reference for this with a careful proof. It would also be nice to see a proof that uses the quantum coordinate ring of $GL_n$ instead of the enveloping algebra (and therefore is phrased in terms of decomposing $V^{\otimes r}$ as a left-comodule for this coordinate ring and a right $H_r$-module).

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

This goes back to Jimbo I think. A reference is: "A q-difference analogue of $U(\mathfrak g)$, Hecke algebra and the Yang-Baxter equation'', Lett. Math. Phys. 11 (1986).

It has been much studied though, so there are lots of subsequent papers, some of which might be closer to what you are looking for? For example this paper studies an analogue of Schur-Weyl duality for "walled Brauer algebras", and this paper studies a two-parameter version.

share|cite|improve this answer

Hi Jonah - Section 4 of this paper deduces a quantum Schur-Weyl duality from quantum GL(n)-GL(m) Howe duality. But this doesn't use the quantum coordinate ring.

share|cite|improve this answer

Georgia Benkart and Sarah Witherspoon worked on a 2-parameter generalization, but also in quantized enveloping algebra language. See math/0108038.

There is also wide available work on various q-Schur algebras. It is hard to find what is not known as far as various basic analogues here are concerned.

share|cite|improve this answer

This is treated in section 8.6 of the book "Quantum Groups and Their Representations" by Klimyk and Schmudgen, although also not using the quantum coordinate algebra.

share|cite|improve this answer

Too late maybe but still - "Noncommutative symmetric functions V: a degenerate version of U_q(gl_N)" by Krob and Thibon has the quantum coordinate ring version very carefully (I think) written. It is aimed at the $q=0$ case but the generic $q$ is treated in detail too.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.