Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to understand Bruhat's generalized Schwartz functions over (Hausforff) locally compact Abelian groups [1], following this paper [2] by Osborne. There, the Schwarz-Bruhat space $\mathscr{S}(G)$ of complex functions over a (Hausdorff) locally compact Abelian group $G$ is defined based on the notion of differential operators on groups. I have trouble understanding how differential operators are defined in groups that are discrete; see questions 1 and 2 below.

For simplicity I only look at groups of the form For simplicity (and as in the previous post ) I will always assume that $G$ is a group of the form $$G=\mathbb{R}^a\times\mathbb{T}^b\times\mathbb{Z}^c\times F$$, where $\mathbb{T}^m$ is an $m$-dimensional torus and $F$ an finite Abelian group given in the form $$F=\mathbb{Z}_{d_1}\times\cdots\times \mathbb{Z}_{d_e}.$$

For groups of the form $G$, the space $\mathscr{S}(G)$ is defined as follows: a function $f$ is in $\mathscr{S}(G)$ if $f$ is infinitely differentiable, and if $P(\partial)f\in L^2(G)$ for every polynomial (in the $\mathbb{R}^a\times \mathbb{Z}^c$ variables) differential operator $P(\partial)$ on $G$.

Question 1 What is a ``polynomial differential operator $P(\partial)$'' over a group $G$? I am vaguely aware that groups of the form $G$ are the Abelian Lie groups that are compactly-generated (cf. [3]). Therefore, I assume there must exist a robust-notion of differentiability of functions over these groups. Still I do not know how differential operators on function-spaces over discrete groups such as $\mathbb{Z}^c$ or $F$ should be defined.

Question 2 Why does $P(\partial)$ have to be a polynomial differential operator only in the $\mathbb{R}^a\times \mathbb{Z}^c$ variables. I do not understand why $\mathbb{T}^b$ and $F$ are not mentioned. Does it perhaps something to do with compactness?

Related posts.

I have opened another post asking questions about an alternative equivalent way to define the Schwartz-Bruhat space via functions of rapid decay. Also, my first question seems to be related to this question.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

I strongly recommend you to read the François Bruhat paper, that Osborne cites. For an arbitrary locally compact (not necessarily abelian) group $G$ Bruhat defines smooth function $\varphi:G\to{\mathbb C}$ as the one that can be locally represented as a composition $$ \varphi=\psi\circ\pi $$ where $\pi:G\to H$ is a continuous homomorphism into a Lie group $H$, and $\psi:H\to{\mathbb C}$ is a "usual" smooth function on $H$ (considered as a smooth manifold). (Actually, this is the definition for the so-called LP-groups, and the general definition becomes obvious after that.)

Bruhat describes the most important properties of the space ${\mathcal E}(G)$ of smooth functions on $G$ (it is not obvious, for example, that ${\mathcal E}(G)$ is always dense in ${\mathcal C}(G)$). As far as I remember, he gives also a definition of a differential operator on $G$, but I am not sure, anyway you can also take a look at my paper, where differential operators on $G$ are defined as linear maps $$ D:{\mathcal E}(G)\to {\mathcal E}(G) $$
which preserve the support of functions: $$ \text{supp}(D\varphi)\subseteq \text{supp}\ \varphi,\qquad \varphi\in {\mathcal E}(G). $$ ($\text{supp}\ \varphi$ is the set of points in $G$ where the germ of $\varphi$ is non-zero). One can prove (see again my paper) that every such operator has unique decomposition $$ D=\sum_{\alpha\in{\mathbb N}_I}\xi_\alpha\cdot\partial e_\alpha, $$ where $I$ is the set of indices (in general, infinite) for a given basis $\{e_i;\ i\in I\}$ in the tangent space $T_1(G)$ (=Lie algebra of $G$), ${\mathbb N}_I$ the set of multi-indices over $I$, $\partial e_\alpha$ are the corresponding translation-invariant differential operators on $G$, and $\xi_\alpha$ are some smooth functions on $G$ (defined by $D$).

$D$ is called a polynomial differential operator, if the coefficients $\xi_\alpha$ are polynomials, i.e. usual polynomials of finite sets of real characters $\chi:G\to{\mathbb R}$ (see Hewitt-Ross; obviously, each polynomial on ${\mathbb R}^a\times {\mathbb T}^b\times {\mathbb Z}^c \times F$ vanishes on ${\mathbb T}^b$ and $F$).

Using these notions one can define the Schwarz-Bruhat space ${\mathcal S}(H)$ on an abelian Lie group $H$ as consisting of smooth functions $\psi:H\to{\mathbb C}$ with compactly generated support and with the property $$ \sup_{x\in H}|D\psi(x)|<\infty, $$ for every polynomial differential operator $D$ on $H$. And if $G$ is an arbitrary locally compact abelian group (not necessarily a Lie group) then the space ${\mathcal S}(G)$ is defined as the direct limit (=union) of the spaces ${\mathcal S}(H)$ where $H$ runs through all Lie quotient groups of $G$: $$ {\mathcal S}(G)=\bigcup_H {\mathcal S}(H). $$ I believe this is equivalent to Osborne's definitions. By $K^m$ he means, I think, the $m$-th power of a set $K\subseteq G$, defined by induction $$ K^1=K,\qquad K^{m+1}=K^m\cdot K, $$ where $A\cdot B=\{a\cdot b;\ a\in A,\ b\in B\}$ (this is for your new post).

share|improve this answer
    
+1 Thanks! This seems quite useful. I am reading your post slowly later and giving you more feedback. Also, I am trying to read Bruhat's paper, but I struggle with the French (I can only read some of it because I speak Spanish)... the paper has sadly not been translated, right? –  Juan Bermejo Vega Jan 7 at 20:53
1  
As far as I know, it was not translated. I can send you my papers in English on this topic. –  Sergei Akbarov Jan 7 at 20:55
    
I would be grateful. Perhaps you could simply add the links to your answer. –  Juan Bermejo Vega Jan 7 at 21:00

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.