MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $\overline{M}_{g,n}$ be the moduli space of $n$-pointed genus $g$ Deligne-Mumford stable curves. This is a normal projective scheme. Then $$codim_{\overline{M}_{g,n}}Sing(\overline{M}_{g,n})\geq 2.$$ For instance for $g = 1, n = 2$ wa have that $\overline{M}_{1,2}$ is a rational surface with four singular points.

Does there exist any value of $g$ and $n$ for which $Sing(\overline{M}_{g,n})$ is in codimension at least $3$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 14 down vote accepted

No. In fact more is true: the locus of all $n$-pointed curves of genus $g-1$ with a single elliptic tail $E$, such that $\mathrm{Aut}(E)=\mathbf Z/6$, has codimension two in $\overline M_{g,n}$ and consists of noncanonical singularities. This was famously determined by Harris and Mumford in their paper on the Kodaira dimension of the moduli space of curves (they work with $n=0$ but this makes no difference).

share|cite|improve this answer
I guess that the locus of genus $g-1$ curves with an elliptic tail $E$ such that $Aut(E) = \mathbb{Z}/4$ is singular and in codimension $2$ as well. Let us assume that $g+n\geq 4$. Do you know if in this case these two loci are exactly the codimension $2$ part of $Sing(\overline{M}_{g,n})$ or if there is something else? – S_Z_S Jan 7 '14 at 16:05
Thank you very much. – S_Z_S Jan 7 '14 at 16:12
That sounds about right. The point is that $\overline M_{g,n}$ is smooth away from the loci of curves with automorphism. For $(g,n)$ not "too small" the only codimension one locus of curves with automorphisms is the locus of elliptic tails -- but an elliptic tail involution does not produce a singularity -- and then again for $(g,n)$ not too small, the only codimension two loci are the ones where the elliptic tail has $j$-invariant $0$ or $1728$. There is of course something that needs to be checked by hand to see that $g+n \geq 4$ suffices. – Dan Petersen Jan 8 '14 at 8:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.