I have a question about Aubin-Lions Lemma, the standard Aubin-Lions lemma need those Banach Space be reflexive spaces, are there any version of Aubin-Lions without reflexivity?

Standard aubin-lions:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aubin-Lions_lemma

-
Yes, this is too vague. – Deane Yang Dec 24 '13 at 1:48
May be I should ask, are there any famous paper relate to Aubin-Lions Lemma after Simon's? – user44565 Dec 24 '13 at 1:56
@Deane Yang I have edited my question, now it is clearly. I main concern that can we remove the reflexivity in some special cases? – user44565 Dec 25 '13 at 2:18
This revision is a much more appropriate question. – Deane Yang Dec 26 '13 at 17:53
there are some new papers about aubin-lions-dubinskii lemma: [1] a note on aubin-lions-dubinskii lemmas(link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10440-013-9858-8) – user45757 Jan 20 '14 at 7:55

I was wondering the same recently, and it seems to my that the answer is yes (you can get rid of reflexivity). Look at the paper of Jacques Simon : Compact sets in the spaces $L^p(0,T,B)$.
if $\{F\}$ is bounded in $L^q(0,T,X), \{F^\prime\}$ bounded in $L^1(0,T,Y),$ with the usual assumption :$$X\underset{compact}{\hookrightarrow} B\underset{continous}{\hookrightarrow}Y,$$ then $\{F\}$ is relatively compact in $L^p(0,T,B)$, for $p<q$ where $X,B,Y$ are only Banach (assumption 8.1 in the paper). The corresponding result holds for $\{F\}\subset L^\infty$ and $\{F^\prime\}\subset L^r$ with $r>1$ (gives relative compactness in $\mathcal{C}(0,T,B)$).