MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $V$ be a model of $ZFC+GCH$ and let $V[G]$ be a generic extension of $V$ in which $CH$ fails.

Question 1. Is there a model $W$ such that:

1) $V \subseteq W \subseteq V[G],$

2) $W\models CH,$

3) $W$ and $V[G]$ have the same cardinals.

Question 2. The same question as above, this time assuming $V=L$ and there are no large cardinals?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The answer is no in general. If $V[G]$ is a model of Martin's maximum and $W$ is an inner model of $V[G]$ with the same $\omega_2$, then $\mathcal P(\omega_1)^W=\mathcal P(\omega_1)^{V[G]}$, so $\mathsf{CH}$ fails in $W$. In fact, many strong reflection principles can be used here instead of $\mathsf{MM}$, for instance we could have $V[G]$ a model of Rado's conjecture. Also, (if there is a $\Sigma_1$-reflecting cardinal in $L$) there is a forcing extension $L[G]$ of $L$ where $\mathsf{BPFA}$ holds, and if $W$ is an inner model of $L[G]$ with the same $\omega_2$, then $W=L[G]$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, it was unexpected for me. What if we assume there are no large cardinals in V? – Mohammad Golshani Dec 9 '13 at 4:32
I think your $W[G]$ is $V[G]$. – Mohammad Golshani Dec 9 '13 at 4:36
Thanks, I fixed the typo. Yes, that is the question to think about, what we can say without large cardinals. – Andrés E. Caicedo Dec 9 '13 at 5:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.