0

Given two distinct and noninteracting quantum mechanical systems $\mathfrak{S}_1$ and $\mathfrak{S}_2$ with state spaces $\mathcal H_1$ and $\mathcal H_2$, respectively, the state space of the combined system $\mathcal S_1+\mathcal S_2$ is the tensor product Hilbert space $\mathcal H=\mathcal H_1\otimes\mathcal H_2$. Density operators $W\in\mathcal D(\mathcal H)$, and effects $F\in\mathcal E(\mathcal H)$. Similarly, there are corresponding symbols $W_i\in\mathcal D(\mathcal H_i), F_i\in\mathcal E(\mathcal H_i)$ for subsystems $\mathfrak{S}_i(i=1,2)$, respectively.

Given any quantum operation, $\Phi: \mathcal D(\mathcal H)\rightarrow \mathcal D(\mathcal H)$, of the composite system $\mathcal S_1+\mathcal S_2$.

Problem: (1) Do there exist whether or not two quantum operation $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$, of the subsystems $\mathfrak{S}_1$ and $\mathfrak{S}_2$, respectively, such that the following diagram is commutative:

$$ \begin{diagram} \node{\mathcal D(\mathcal H_1)} \arrow[4]{e,t}{\phi_1}\node[4]{\mathcal D(\mathcal H_1)}\ \node{}\ \node{\mathcal D(\mathcal H_1\otimes\mathcal H_2)} \arrow[2]{n,l}{Tr_2} \arrow[4]{e,t}{\Phi} \arrow[2]{s,l}{Tr_1} \node[4]{\mathcal D(\mathcal H_1\otimes\mathcal H_2)} \arrow[2]{s,r}{Tr_1} \arrow[2]{n,r}{Tr_2} \ \node{}\ \node{\mathcal D(\mathcal H_2)} \arrow[4]{e,b}{\phi_2} \node[4]{\mathcal D(\mathcal H_2)} \end{diagram} $$ i.e. $$\begin{eqnarray} Tr_2(\Phi(W))&=&\frac{tr(\Phi(W))}{tr(\phi_1(Tr_2(W)))}\phi_1(Tr_2(W)),\ Tr_1(\Phi(W))&=&\frac{tr(\Phi(W))}{tr(\phi_2(Tr_1(W)))}\phi_2(Tr_1(W)), \end{eqnarray} $$ where $\phi_i: \mathcal D(\mathcal H_i)\rightarrow \mathcal D(\mathcal H_i)(i=1,2)$ and $Tr_i: \mathcal D(\mathcal H)\rightarrow \mathcal D(\mathcal H_i)$ is a partial trace with respect to the subsystem $\mathfrak{S}_i(i=1,2)$.

(2) If quantum operation $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ exist, give the relationship among the quantum operations $\Phi, \phi_{1}$ and $\phi_2$.

flag
I have edited the slab of LaTeX which you seemed to have pasted in without using the preview function. Please have a look at the guidelines as to what MO does and doesn't support, and how to get round them. – Yemon Choi Feb 11 2010 at 10:17
@Yemon: Your (heroic!) edit doesn't seem too successful to me. I am getting this text: Unknown environment "diagram". – Harald Hanche-Olsen Feb 11 2010 at 13:58
@Harald: if you saw what happened before my edit, I think the present version is a considerable improvement:) I had insufficient zeal/charity for trying to work out what the diagram was supposed to depict and then recoding it – Yemon Choi Feb 11 2010 at 19:56
@Yemon: Yes, I had looked at the edit history. That's why I said “heroic”. Not complaining, really. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Feb 12 2010 at 12:34

1 Answer

5

If I understand the question right, essentially what is being asked is: for a general quantum operation on a system with two subsystems, can you learn what happens to subsystem 1 just by looking at the initial state of subsystem 1, and what happens to subsystem 2 just by looking at the initial state of subsystem 2. If this is what is being asked, the answer is No: consider the case where the two subsystems have the same dimension and the quantum operation $\Phi$ which swaps the subsystems.

link|flag

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.