Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\overline{\mathcal{M}}^r_{g,n}$ the space of $n$ pointed $r$-stable curves of genus $g$, endowed with a root of the canonical sheaf, and let $\mathcal{C} \to \overline{\mathcal{M}}^r_{g,n}$ be the universal curve. The family $\mathcal{C}$ is endowed with a universal root of the canonical, that I denote $\mathcal{S}$. What is the relation between $\pi_!\mathcal{S}$ and the Hodge bundle $\mathbb{E}:=\pi_*\omega_{\mathcal{C}}$ on $\overline{\mathcal{M}}^r_{g,n}$? For instance what can one say about the chern classes?

share|improve this question
2  
$\pi _*\mathcal{S}$ is zero (at least when $r>2$), because a $r$-th root of $\omega _C$ on a generic curve $C$ has no section. Maybe you mean $\pi _!\mathcal{S}$ ? –  abx Nov 18 '13 at 17:32
    
Good point. Yes $\pi_{!}\mathcal{S}$ would be ok, I edit the question. I would be curious to see even in the derived category. –  IMeasy Nov 18 '13 at 20:12

2 Answers 2

A detailed computation of the Chern character of $R^\bullet \pi_\ast \mathcal S$ can be found in Alessandro Chiodo's "Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of twisted curves and $r$th roots". As abx says it is a generalization of Mumford's computation of the Chern character of the Hodge bundle.

Let me also say that (at least today) this is a problem that just screams for an application of Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch (which is indeed what Mumford and Chiodo are using).

share|improve this answer
    
Yeah, both your answer are very nice. It is clear that GRR is the way to get it right. I seem to understand anyway that it would be far too optimistic to expect a quick formula relating the two sheaves. –  IMeasy Nov 18 '13 at 21:43

I assume that your $\mathcal{S}$ satisfies $\mathcal{S}^{\otimes r}\cong \omega _{\mathcal{C}/\mathcal{M}}$. Then the computation of $\pi _!\mathcal{S}$ can be done exactly as the computation of $\pi _*\omega _{\mathcal{C}/\mathcal{M}}^{\otimes n}$ in Mumford, Stability of projective varieties, L'Enseignement Mathématique, Vol. 23 (1977), §5 $-$ just put $n=\frac{1}{r} $. The result is more complicated that what you suggest, it involves the boundary divisors.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.