2
$\begingroup$

Let $D$ be a divisor on a (complex) K3 surface.

Suppose $D^2\geq0$. In general, $D$ is nef if $D\cdot C\geq0$ for all irreducible curves on the surface.

Is it sufficient in our case to check this for smooth rational curves (i.e. the (-2) curves) ?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ What if there are no $(-2)$-curves? A very general polarized K3 surface over $\mathbb{C}$ contains no smooth rational curve. $\endgroup$ Nov 12, 2013 at 12:38
  • $\begingroup$ Jason, you are of course correct in general, but on a K3 if there are no $(-2)$ curves, then the cone of curves is the same as the (closure of the) ample cone and the same as the positive part of the cone defined by $D^2\geq 0$ so for any $D$ with $D^2\geq 0$ $D$ or $-D$ is nef and so with the additional assumption that $-D$ is not effective or not nef, it follows that it is enough to check on $(-2)$-curves (because there is nothing to check). :) $\endgroup$ Nov 12, 2013 at 23:55
  • $\begingroup$ @user875280: It seems that you have gone on an editing spree recently. Kindly please stop editing posts only to perform minor corrections. Thank you. $\endgroup$
    – Alex M.
    Apr 7, 2021 at 16:14

2 Answers 2

5
$\begingroup$

First off, you obviously have to assume something about $-D$ not being effective, because otherwise you could take a negative ample class.

The cone of curves of a K3 surface is pretty well described in this paper. And there is a newer version of it that works in positive characteristic as well here.

Here is what you get out of this:

  1. It is possible that there are no $(-2)$-curves on a K3 surface, but in this case for every divisor with $D^2\geq 0$ either $D$ or $-D$ is both nef and effective.
  2. If the Picard number is $2$, it is possible that there is only one $(-2)$-curve. In this case there are actually (effective) curves with non-negative and even positive self-intersection which are not nef. However, they are negative on the sole $(-2)$-curve. (I think I will leave this for the reader for now).
  3. In all other cases the $(-2)$-curves generate a cone which is dense in the cone of curves, so any divisor that is non-negative on the $(-2)$-curves is non-negative on every effective curve.

So, it actually looks like that what you want is true.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Yes, as long as $D$ is effective, it's enough to check this for $C$ running over all smooth rational curves. See Corollary 1.7 of Chapter 8 of Huybrechts's notes http://www.math.uni-bonn.de/people/huybrech/K3Global.pdf and the discussion around it.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Wait a moment. But if $D$ is effective and $D^2\geq 0$ then $D$ is nef on any surface, isn't it? $\endgroup$
    – Heitor
    Nov 12, 2013 at 17:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not if the divisor $D$ is reducible - else take $D = C + f$ on a Hirzebruch surface with $C^2 = -2, f^2 = 0, C \cdot f = 1$, and notice $D \cdot C = -1$. If you don't assume $D$ is effective, then Jason's comment shows you that there's no way to distinguish $D$ from its negative. $\endgroup$ Nov 12, 2013 at 17:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.