Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm reading this site:holomorphy of inverse map There is a statement made by Colin Tan at the last answer made by himself.

Any non-constant surjective holomorphic map between connected compact complex manifolds of equal dimension is a ramified finite-sheet covering.

I am amazing about this result.I cannot prove it.Is this satement right?Can you prove it or give me some reference about this topic?

Since there are some disagreements,can you give some mild condition to draw the conclusion? Thanks in advance!

share|improve this question
4  
I do not think this is true without a flatness assumption. The map $\pi \colon X \to \mathbb{P}^2$ obtained by blowing-up a point is a surjective, holomorphic map between two smooth complex surfaces, but it is not a finite-sheet covering since it contracts the exceptional divisor, which is a curve in $X$. –  Francesco Polizzi Nov 6 '13 at 13:17
    
The qualification that the covering is "ramified" is important here. Checking Wikpedia, the standard terminology is "branched covering" rather than "ramified", that is, a covering over a dense subspace of the base. With this qualification, your example is not yet a counterexample for your blowup is bijective outside the blowup point in the base projective plane. –  Colin Tan Jul 20 at 6:38

1 Answer 1

The correct statement is the following:

Proposition. Let $X$, $Y$ be irreducible complex spaces. Then every holomorphic, finite surjection $\pi \colon X \longrightarrow Y$ is an analytic (in general ramified) covering map.

For a proof of this standard result, see [Grauert-Remmert, Coherent Analytic Sheaves, page 179].

From the Proposition one can deduce the following

Corollary. Let $X$, $Y$ be irreducible, compact complex manifolds of the same dimension. Then any holomorphic, flat surjection $\pi \colon X \longrightarrow Y$ is an analytic covering map.

Indeed, since $\dim X = \dim Y$ one has that the dimension of the general fibre of $\pi$ is $0$, and since $\pi$ is flat all the fibres must have dimension $0$. Finally, $X$ and $Y$ are compact so we deduce that all the fibres are finite, hence $\pi$ is a finite map and one can apply the Proposition.

Without the flatness assumption the statement of the Corollary is clearly false, as shown by the following example. Let $X$ be the blow-up of $\mathbb{P}^2$ at a point $p$ and $\pi \colon X \longrightarrow \mathbb{P}^2$ the blow-up map. Then $\pi$ is birational, hence the general fibre consists of a single point. However, $\pi$ is not an analytic covering, since there is a fibre of dimension $1$: in fact, $\pi$ contracts the exceptional divisor $E \subset X$ to the point $p$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.