MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have seen two kinds of definitions of irreducible connections on fibre bundls: A connection is said to be irreducible if

  1. the holonomy group is precisely $G$ and not a proper subgroup.

or 2. there exist a constant $C$ depending on the connection $D$ such that \begin{equation} \|s\|_{H^{1,2}} \le C\|Ds\|_{L^2} \end{equation} for all $s\in H^{1,2}(\Omega^0(ad\eta))$ .

My question is: what is the relation and difference of the above two definitions?

share|cite|improve this question

For a connection A, Let $\Gamma_A=\{u\in \mathscr{G}\ |\ u(A)=A\}$, $\mathscr{G}$ is the gauge group. Let $H_A$ be the holonomy group correspond to connection A, then $\Gamma_A$ is isomorphic to the centralizer of $H_A$ in G.

For $u\in\ \Gamma_A$, $u(A)=u-(\nabla_Au)u^{-1}$, so the lie algebra of $\Gamma_A$ correspond to kernel of $\nabla_A$, that is your second definition. The inverse is similar.

You could find above related topic in Geometry of 4-manifold, S.K.Donaldson P.B.Kronheimer in pages near Lemma (4.2.8)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.