MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

By the pointed canonical bundle formula the canonical bundle of $\overline{M}_{g,n}$ is given by $$K_{\overline{M}_{g,n}} = 13\lambda+\psi-2\delta-\sum_{I}\delta_{1,I}$$ where $\lambda$ is the Hodge class, $\psi = \sum_{i=1}^{n}\psi_{i}$ is the sum of the psi-classes and $\delta$ is total boundary divisor.

Are there constraints involving $g,n$ which imply that $K_{\overline{M}_{g,n}}$ is ample ?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

The cotangent bundle of $\overline M_{g,n}$ is never ample. You can see this for instance by restricting it to the hyperelliptic locus.

There has been a lot of work in the last 5-10 years on running the (log) minimal model program on the moduli space of curves. You can read about this to get a feeling for how far from true it is that $K_{\overline M_{g,n}}$ is ample. There's a survey of Fedorchuk-Smyth in the Handbook of Moduli, for instance.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.