MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a finite spectrum. Say that $X$ has characteristic two if multiplication by two on $X$ is nullhomotopic.

Does there exist a noncontractible finite spectrum of characteristic two?

(This is mentioned as an open problem in Barratt's 1959 paper "Spaces of finite characteristic.")

share|cite|improve this question
It feels like nilpotence or the thick subcategory theorem could be useful here... – Dylan Wilson Nov 3 '13 at 6:34
@Dylan: I do not find it obvious that this class of spectra is closed under cofibers. – Lennart Meier Nov 4 '13 at 16:02
Damn... if only we knew Freyd's generating hypothesis were true. Then closure under cofibers would be 'obvious.' ;) – Dylan Wilson Nov 5 '13 at 15:00
up vote 15 down vote accepted

This doesn't seem very hard. Am I missing something?

Let $X$ be a non-trivial finite spectrum of characteristic $2$. Then let $R=\mathrm{Hom}(X,X)$, the function spectrum of maps $X$ to $X$. This $R$ is an associative $S$-algebra, with $0=2$ in $\pi_0R$; furthermore, $R$ is finite.

If $X\neq0$, then $H_*(X;F)\neq0$, where $F=\mathbb{F}_2$, and hence $H_*(R;F)\neq0$. Note that in this case the unit map $S\to R$ has non-trivial image in homology (which is the unit of the ring $H_*(R;F)$), and thus $H^0(R;F)\to F$ is surjective.

Consider the forgetful functor $\mathrm{Ass}_S\to \mathrm{Unital}_S$ from associative $S$-algebras to unital spectra. This has a (homotopical) left adjoint $T_*$: given a unital spectrum $M=(M,f\colon S\to M)$, let $T_*(M)$ be the homotopy pushout in $\mathrm{Ass}_S$ of $$ T(M) \xleftarrow{T(f)} T(S)\to S, $$ where $T$ is the free associative algebra functor.

You can also build $T_*(M) = \mathrm{colim}_n T_*^n(M)$ iteratively a la the James construction: to get $T_*^n(M)$, glue the $n$-fold smash product $M^{\wedge n}$ to $T_*^{n-1}(M)$ along a suitable map $F^n(M)\to M^{\wedge n}$. [I.e., consider the $n$-cubical diagram obtained from smashing $S\to M$ with itself $n$-times; $F^n(M)\to M^{\wedge n}$ is the map from the hocolim of the deleted $n$-cube to the object at the terminal position of the $n$-cube.]

Let $M=S^0\cup_2 e^1\to R$ be the map of unital spectra which exists by our hypothesis on $R$. The map extends to an associative algebra map $$ T_*(M) \to R. $$ In homology, $H_*(T_*(M);F) \approx F[x]$ with $|x|=1$, since $M^{\wedge n}/F_n(M) \approx S^n$.

In mod 2 cohomology, the generator $u\in H^0(T_*(M);F_2)$ must satisfy $Sq^1(u)\neq0$, and an easy argument shows that therefore $Sq^n(u)\neq0$ for all $n$. But $H^0(R;F) \to H^0(T_*(M);F) \xrightarrow{\sim} H^0(S;F)=F$ is surjective, so there exists $v\in H^0(R;F)$ such that $Sq^n(v)\neq0$ for all $n$, contradicting finiteness.

share|cite|improve this answer
Huh. That's... much easier than I expected a proof to be. – Tyler Lawson Nov 14 '13 at 5:31
At odd primes, how many relations to you have to impose in an associative algebra beyond $p=0$ to detect $\xi_1$? – Tyler Lawson Nov 14 '13 at 5:36
Thank you! This is very nice. – Akhil Mathew Nov 14 '13 at 14:31
I asked @TylerLawson on chat to explain the easy argument referred to in the last paragraph, and here's what he said (edited for length): "the cohomology of T_*(M) inherits a coalgebra structure from the ring structure, so there's a map H^*(T_*M) -> H^*(T_*M) ⊗ H^*(T_*M)... however, the Cartan formula tells you that Sq^n(u) maps to Sq^n(u⊗u) = sum Sq^p(u)⊗Sq^q(u) in particular, by induction we know Sq^{n-1}(u)⊗Sq^1(u) is nonzero thus Sq^n(u) must have been nonzero in the first place." – Saul Glasman Nov 14 '13 at 15:49
Is associativity necessary? It seems to me that this argument shows that any ring spectrum (up to homotopy, and not necessarily associative) with $2 = 0$ cannot be a finite spectrum (which is a more general version of the statement that the mod $2$ Moore spectrum fails to be a ring spectrum). – Akhil Mathew Nov 14 '13 at 17:10

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.