MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Logarithmic mean of two positive real numbers is well defined in the literature, it has also been extended to more than two arguments in various papers. Is there any notion of logarithmic mean of random variables or functions? Thank you for your help and time.

share|cite|improve this question
By the way, I know that logarithmic mean of convex functionals is there in the literature, but I want to know can we define it for random variables or just positive functions ? – andy Oct 31 '13 at 23:07

You're looking for $e^{E \log X}$. It has all the nice properties you'd like it to.

share|cite|improve this answer
Could you expand a bit on your answer? – Suvrit Nov 1 '13 at 1:27
Yes, Omer, I would greatly appreciate if you could kindly elaborate a little more, anyway thank you so much. – andy Nov 1 '13 at 3:00
For two positive real numbers, this gives the geometric mean, not the logarithmic mean. Have you looked at ? – S. Carnahan Nov 1 '13 at 9:42

Once we know how to define a geometric mean of two quantities, the logarithmic mean is just an integral away.

Indeed, say $g(t) := e^{E[(1-t)\log X]+E[t\log Y]}$, then we could define a logarithmic mean as $$L(X,Y) := \int_0^1 g(t)dt.$$

Reasoning: The above idea is inspired by noting that the ordinary logarithmic mean between two positive scalars, $x$ and $y$ may be viewed as $L(x,y) = \int_0^1 x^{1-t}y^tdt$, where the integrand is nothing but the (weighted) geometric mean.

share|cite|improve this answer
As I understood it, the question is not asking “give the logarithmic mean of two random variables”, but rather “define the logarithmic expectation of a single random variable, generalising logarithmic mean analogously to how ordinary expectation generalises the arithmetic mean of a finite multiset”. – Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine Nov 2 '13 at 23:25
@Peter: so maybe I've misunderstood the question....hopefully the OP clarifies; but since the name "logarithmic mean" has a well-defined meaning, I interpreted it as above.... – Suvrit Nov 3 '13 at 0:01
Thank you guys for your kind replies. – andy Nov 3 '13 at 0:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.