5
$\begingroup$

To get a thorough analysis of the critical point structure of a smooth function $f:M\to\mathbb{R}$ on a smooth Hilbert manifold $M$, a compactness assumption gets us far. That assumption is Condition C of Palais and Smale (note that this is automatically satisfied for $M$ compact). It ultimately implies (for instance) the Deformation Lemma and the Mini-Max Principle.

But what if Condition C fails? I'm interested in to what extent I lose control over the function. For instance, I am aware of Uhlenbeck's "perturbation method", where if $f$ doesn't satisfy Condition C then we can look at $f_\varepsilon=f+\varepsilon\cdot g$ (fix function $g$) that satisfies Condition C and try to get critical points of $f$ as limits of those of $f_\varepsilon$.
When Condition C fails, is there a work-around to save the Mini-Max Principle?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think you'll get far unless you're at the borderline where Condition C (and compactness) just barely fails. If so, Uhlenbeck and others have shown in certain particular situations (minimal hypersurfaces and self-dual Yang-Mills connections are the most notable examples), there is a global minimum but it lives outside the original Hilbert manifold you started with. I have no idea what could happen at a saddle point. $\endgroup$
    – Deane Yang
    Nov 14, 2013 at 2:27

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

There are some works on this, but maybe THE expert on this topic is Abbas Bahri. Take a look at his works or google "critical point at infinity".

See, for example: this paper or his book ""Critical Points at Infinity in Some Variational Problem".

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ I see this is a way to get back the deformation lemma, in particular for studying the flow of a functional. Does this also help us with the critical point structure of the function itself? $\endgroup$ Oct 27, 2013 at 23:01
  • $\begingroup$ I think you must make your question more precise: are you trying to find some general condition that will allow you to generalize Palis-Smale (unlikely) or do you have a concrete problem in mind and are wondering what sort of technique or trick will allow you to work around it ? $\endgroup$ Oct 28, 2013 at 13:50
  • $\begingroup$ I think what alvarezpaiva is trying to say is that it's impossible to say much unless you describe a rather specific concrete situation in which you are trying to use the minimax principle. $\endgroup$
    – Deane Yang
    Nov 14, 2013 at 2:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.