MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I imagine the dynamic of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z}$) on $\mathbb{C}^2$ has been studied. Does one know if it is recurrent or ergodic (with respect to the Lebesgue measure) ? Is there any explicit description of the orbits ?

Thank you for your help,


share|cite|improve this question
-1 How does it act? – Marc Palm Oct 21 '13 at 13:34
@MarcPalm I assume in the "obvious way" that 2x2 matrices act on a two-dimensional vector space?! – Igor Rivin Oct 21 '13 at 13:47
By linear transformation. Namely a matrix $ \left ( \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array} \right ) $ acts by $ \left ( \begin{array}{cc} a & b \\ c & d \end{array} \right ) \cdot \left ( \begin{array}{c} u \\ v \end{array} \right ) = \left ( \begin{array}{c} au + bv \\ cu + dv \end{array} \right ) $. I thought it was obvious :) – Selim G Oct 21 '13 at 13:49
Unless the question is not edited, I can't undo my downvote:( – Marc Palm Oct 22 '13 at 13:46
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Since matrices from $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$ are real, the action on $\mathbb C^2$ is the same as the diagonal action on the product of two copies of $\mathbb R^2$. Now, the action of $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$ on $\mathbb R^2$ is well-known to be conjugate to its action on the space $H$ of horocycles in the hyperbolic plane $\mathbb H^2$. The ergodic properties of the latter action are the same as for the horocycle flow on the quotient surface.

A single horocycle is determined by a point on the boundary circle of $\mathbb H^2$ and a real parameter (the "radius" of the horocycle). Two horocycles therefore determine a geodesic in $\mathbb H^2$ (which joins the centers of these horocycles) and two points on this geodesic (where it intersects these horospheres). Therefore, the action of $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$ on $H^2$ is conjugate to the product of its action on the unit tangent bundle of $\mathbb H^2$ and the trivial action on $\mathbb R$. Finally, the action of $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$ on $U\mathbb H^2$ is obviously dissipative.

Thus, the answer is that the action of $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$ on $\mathbb C^2$ is dissipative, and its ergodic components ($\equiv$ orbits) are parameterized by the product of the unit tangent bundle of the quotient surface and $\mathbb R$.

Actually, the above argument shows that the action is not just dissipative, but also properly discontinuous.

Edit: Sorry, in the original answer forgot about one more copy of $\mathbb R$.

share|cite|improve this answer
The trivial action of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ on $\mathbb{R}$ is the action by linear fractional transformations ? – Selim G Oct 22 '13 at 7:22
No-no-no - what I mean is the really trivial action - the one which does nothing. – R W Oct 22 '13 at 21:14
It seems to me that your answer contains some confusions. The good reference is Ledrappier-Pollicott below. The linear action of SL(2,C) on $C^2$ is (up to some details) the isometric action of SL(2,C) on the space of horospheres of $H^3$. This action is not dissipative, and admits dense orbits for example.(You can replace $\C$ by $\R$ and $\H^3$ by $\H^2$ above) – Barbara Schapira Oct 30 '13 at 14:32
Did you have a chance to notice that the OP asked about the action of $SL(2,\mathbb Z)$? Or do you want to say that in this situation there is no difference between $\mathbb C$ and $\mathbb Z$? If so, then you are definitely wrong. – R W Oct 30 '13 at 14:51
Sorry, I wrote my comment too fast; it contains many imprecisions. In fact, my first reaction was due to te fact that I was confused by notations $H^2$ and $\mathbb{H}^2$ that I identified in a first reading. – Barbara Schapira Oct 30 '13 at 15:24

The dynamics are ergodic with respect to Lebesgue measure. See

G. Hedlund, Fuchsian groups and mixtures, Ann. of Math. Volume 40, Number 2 (1939) 370-383, available here.

If you prefer something with modern terminology, I'd recommend

F. Ledrappier and M. Pollicott, Ergodic properties of linear actions of (2×2)-matrices, Duke Math. J. Volume 116, Number 2 (2003), 353-388, see here.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.