17

2

Consider the series $$ S_f = \sum_{x=1}^\infty \frac{f}{x^2+fx}. $$ Goldbach showed that, for integers $f \ge 1$, $$ S_f = 1 + \frac12 + \frac13 + \ldots + \frac1f $$ (this follows easily by writing $S_f$ as a telescoping series). Thus $S_f$ is rational for all natural numbers $f \ge 1$. Goldbach claimed that, for all nonintegral (rational) numbers $f$, the sum $S_f$ would be irrational.

Euler showed, by using the substitution $$ \frac1k = \int_0^1 x^{k-1} dx, $$ that $$ S_f = \int_0^1 \frac{1-x^f}{1-x} dx. $$ He evaluated this integral for $f = \frac12$ and found that $S_{1/2} = 2(1 - \ln 2)$ (this also follows easily from Goldbach's series for $S_f$). Thus Goldbach's claim holds for all $f \equiv \frac12 \bmod 1$ since $S_{f+1} = S_f + \frac1{f+1}$.

Here are my questions:

  1. The irrationality of $\ln 2$ was established by Lambert, who proved that $e^r$ is irrational for all rational numbers $r \ne 0$. Are there any (simple) direct proofs?

  2. Has Goldbach's claim about the irrationality of $S_f$ for nonintegral rational values of $f$ been settled in other cases?

flag
1 
I'm suspicious there are (simple) direct proofs for ln2 being irrational (the standard argument for proving e^r is irrational seems simple enough). I did find this cute proof however: math.sc.edu/~filaseta/gradcourses/Math785/… – Alex R. Feb 7 2010 at 17:58
8 
Dear Franz, the function S_f is equal to P(f+1)-P(1), where P(f) is the digamma function (the logarithmic derivative of the Gamma function). There is a formula by Gauss (Gauss' digamma theorem) which then gives an explicit formula for P(p/q)-P(1) in terms of a linear combination (with algebraic coefficients) of logarithms of algebraic numbers. Here (of course) one is using that log(-1) = pi*i. Irrationality (in fact, transcendence) then follows (with a little work) from Baker's theorem on linear forms in logarithms. – Lavender Honey Feb 10 2010 at 19:31
1 
It appears that FC answered the second question, but here is another concrete example. If we let f=1/4, then the integral becomes 4-(pi/2)-ln(8). In general, the linear combination mentioned by FC will always have a nonzero algebraic coefficient on pi, except when p/q=1/2 [and that case was dealt with already]. – Pace Nielsen Feb 10 2010 at 20:41
5 
@FC: You should write this as an answer, and claim the bounty. – Theo Johnson-Freyd Feb 10 2010 at 21:07
4 
If the bounty consisted of a bottle of Bordeaux, then it might be something worth claiming... – Lavender Honey Feb 14 2010 at 18:35
show 2 more comments

1 Answer

5

Please allow me to put my question on top of the list again by turning my comment into an answer. FC's remarks led me to the article "Transcendental values of the digamma function", J. Number Theory 125, No. 2, 298-318 (2007) by Ram Murty and N. Saradha, where Thm. 9 states that the values of S_f are transcendental for rational numbers 0 < f < 1. I apologize for not having asked this question in 2006, which is why I have only a bounty to offer (and a reference to FC from MO in Euler's OO).

link|flag

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.