4
$\begingroup$

In Are the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta simple?, I asked whether it was known that all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann Zeta function were simple or not. It appears that such a proof is missing. But are there partial results concerning a possible upper bound for the multiplicity of any non-trivial zero of Zeta? I'd be interested even in rather weak results like $m_{\rho}=O(f(T_{\rho}))$, with $\rho$ a non trivial zero of Zeta, $T_{\rho}$ its imaginary part and $f$ a map such that $f(x)=o(x)$.
Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

9
$\begingroup$

It is known that the number of zeros with $T-1 < Im(\rho)<T+1$ is $O(\log(T))$. Therefore the multiplicity of a zero $\beta+\gamma i$ will be less than $C \log|\gamma|$ for some absolute constant $C$.

(The result quoted is Theorem 9.2 in Titchmarsh's book.)

There are other theorems that say that a proportion of zeros are simple.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.