9
$\begingroup$

Let $N(T)$ be the number of complex zeros of $\zeta(s)$ with imaginary part between $0$ and $T$, and let $N_k(T)$ be the analogous counting function for the $k$th derivative $\zeta^{(k)}(s)$. Based on numerical evidence for $T<100$, Spira conjectured in 1965 ("Zero free regions of $\zeta^{(k)}(s)$, J. London. Math. Soc. v. 40 1965 pp. 677–682) that $$ N(T)=N_k(T)+[T\log(2)/(2\pi)]\pm 1. $$ Berndt later showed that $$ N(T)=N_k(T)+T\log(2)/(2\pi)+O(\log(T)). $$

Is Spira's original conjecture still open? (I don't expect this is true; finding a counterexample will be a nice project for an undergraduate.)

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

I'm looking at the review, by Haseo Ki, of Hirotaka Akatsuka, Conditional estimates for error terms related to the distribution of zeros of $\zeta'(s)$, J. Number Theory 132 (2012), no. 10, 2242–2257, MR2944752. It says,

Assuming the Riemann hypothesis, the author shows $$N(T)=N_1(T)+{T\log2\over2\pi}+O\left({\log T\over\sqrt{\log\log T}}\right)$$ and comments that there is a barrier to further improvement of this.

$\endgroup$
0
6
$\begingroup$

Shorokhodov gave an explicit counterexample to Spira's conjecture in "Pade approximates and numerical analysis of the Riemann zeta function", Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, vol. 43 no. 9 (2003) pp. 1277-1298. He computed, for $T=1420$, 1000 zeros of $\zeta(s)$, 844 zeros of $\zeta^\prime(s)$, and noted $1420\log 2/2\pi\approx 156.65$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.