Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A recent answer motivated me to post about this. I've always had a vague, unpleasant feeling that somehow lattice theory has been completely robbed of the important place it deserves in mathematics - lattices seem to show up everywhere, the author or teacher says "observe that these __ form a complete lattice" or something similar, and then moves on, never to speak of what that might imply. But, not currently knowing anything about them, I can't be sure. What would be a good place to learn about lattice theory, especially its implications for "naturally occurring" lattices (subgroups, ideals, etc.)?

share|improve this question
add comment

6 Answers

up vote 13 down vote accepted

A good, user-friendly, modern, introductory textbook is Davey and Priestley's Introduction to Lattices and Order.

Incidentally, Gian-Carlo Rota used to say much the same thing as you, Zev: that lattice theory had been robbed of its rightful place in mathematics.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the recommendation! Also, I think I may have heard Rota's quote somewhere, but couldn't remember its correct attribution, or whether it was a quote, etc., hence the similar phrasing. –  Zev Chonoles Feb 6 '10 at 1:42
    
I second this recommendation. I was just looking through this book again a few days ago and reminded how very nice it is. –  Steve D Feb 6 '10 at 1:47
1  
If you haven't already read Rota's Notices article, here's a link to it: ams.org/notices/199711/comm-rota.pdf –  j.c. Feb 6 '10 at 2:15
1  
Good link, jc. How's this for an opening sentence? "Never in the history of mathematics has a mathematical theory been the object of such vociferous vituperation as lattice theory." Rota could certainly grab your attention. –  Tom Leinster Feb 6 '10 at 2:39
1  
I had the good fortune to learn lattice theory from Priestley herself and completely concur with the sentiment that there is so much more to lattice theory than is commonly thought. The book is very readable and extremely interesting. I recommend it highly. –  Andrew Stacey Feb 6 '10 at 20:08
show 2 more comments

Searching online I found a couple of books:

  • Roman - Lattices and Ordered Sets
  • Blyth - Lattices and Ordered Algebraic Structures

and a set of lecture notes, available for free from the author's webpage:

share|improve this answer
add comment

I've used Garret Birkhoff book "Lattice theory". Could be a bit outdated nowadays, but it gives a deep feeling. Not so sure if it is good as lattice field is not my field.

share|improve this answer
    
@Leonid: I was going to post pretty much exactly what you said. –  Philip Brooker Feb 6 '10 at 3:28
add comment

George Grätzer has written a couple of well-regarded books on lattices. The wikipedia page recommends his "Lattice theory. First concepts and distributive lattices" and several others.

share|improve this answer
1  
G. Gratzer's "General Lattice Theory" is a really thorough monograph. (Beware: it's over 600 pages long!). –  Michał Kukieła Mar 12 '10 at 16:15
add comment

If you want to see lattice theory in action, check out a book on Universal Algebra. Graetzer wrote such a text, so I imagine (but do not know from experience) that he will have many such examples; I cut my teeth on "Algebras, Lattices, Varieties", which has a gentle introduction to lattice theory from a universal algebraic point of view, followed by many universal algebraic results depending on that introduction. This was co-written by my advisor, Ralph McKenzie.

(Hopefully others will share examples from other fields that use lattices.)

Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2010.02.06

share|improve this answer
add comment

I agree with Gerhard. Imho, "Algebras, Lattices, Varieties I" is the best book on universal algebra and lattice theory (perhaps the best math book ever ;) Ironically, it's out of print. However, Burris and Sankapanavar is also great and is free.

As far as sharing examples of the utility of lattice theory, personally, I don't know how I got through my comps in groups, rings, and fields before I learned about lattice theory. Now the only way I can remember many of the theorems is to picture the subgroup (subring, subfield) lattice!

Professor Lampe's Notes on Galois Theory and G-sets are great examples of how these subjects can be viewed abstractly from a universal algebra/lattice theory perspective. The Galois theory notes in particular distil the theory to its basic core, making it very elegant and easy to remember, and highlighting the fact that the underlying algebras need not be fields.

There is still the question of what results are truly universal algebra results, rather than old results couched in universal algebra language? That is an interesting question, and maybe should be the subject of a different mathoverflow post...

share|improve this answer
1  
Ross Willard's "Overview of Modern Universal Algebra" math.uwaterloo.ca/~rdwillar/documents/Publications/torino.pdf gives some answers to the question in the last paragraph above (i.e. what are some of the big theorems of universal algebra?). –  William DeMeo Dec 10 '10 at 0:44
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.