Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is it true that for any DM stack $\mathcal{X}$ (quasicompact, separated, of finite type over a field) there is a Zariski covering $\mathcal{U}_i \to \mathcal{X}$ by open substacks, such that for all $i$ there is an etale finite surjective morphism $\phi_i: Z_i \to \mathcal{U}_i$, where $Z_i$ is a scheme? (Of course it will be true if we remove the condition that the morphisms $\phi_i$ must be finite.)

Upd. Oh, I think by Theorem 6.1 of Laumon, Moret-Bailly "Champs algebriques" it is equivalent to saying that $\mathcal{X}$ admits a Zariski covering by quotient stacks.

share|improve this question
    
Something weaker is true: Etale locally on the coarse moduli space $\mathcal{X}$ is a quotient stack. See, for example, Theorem 2.12 in ma.utexas.edu/users/molsson/homstackfinal.pdf –  Lennart Meier Sep 8 '13 at 1:28
    
Of course I know about it, thanks. –  Nullstellensatz Sep 8 '13 at 10:51

1 Answer 1

Proposition 5.2 of https://www.math.uzh.ch/fileadmin/user/kresch/publikation/geodm.pdf has a partial answer to you question. If X is a DM stack whose coarse module space is a scheme, then it is Zariski locally a quotient stack if and only if it is Zariski locally a finite group quotient.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.