Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There are several ways of producing manifolds,say:

1.orbits space of group action

2.connected sum of manifolds

3.underlying topological space of nonsingular algebraic set


here,i am interested in the 3rd one.

A well known theorem due to Nash and Tognoli says that Every compact smooth manifold is diffeomorphic to a nonsingular real algebraic set.

My question is: Given a manifold $M$,How to find an algebraic set EXPLICITLY whose underlying topological space is diffeomorphic to $M$?

For example, can we find a specific real algebraic set corresponding to an orientable riemann surface of genus $g$?

Thanks for the very useful answers and comments.

I am a student interested in the topology of manifolds and just came to realize so many manifolds could come from algebraic varieties,so the topology of algebraic varieties would be an interesting topic.

A naive idea could be: The topology of algebraic varieties should be determined by the algebra,i.e. the polynomials which generate the ideal corresponding to the variety.

In practice,i guess,it would be quite a hard problem to read topology from algebra,and in many cases,the other direction is also of interest, get algebraic information of the variety by studying the topology of the underlying space.

In the very interesting survey on the topology of real and algebraic varieties given by Janos Kollar

He calls these two directions as Realization problem and Recognition Problem respectively.

To be more precise,realization problem studies which topological space could be realized as the underlying space of a projective algebraic variety,and recognition problem studies which algebraic properties are determined by its underlying topological space.

These two problems clearly summaries the interplay of algebra and topology in the algebraic variety.

Now my question is:

What's the status of the realization problem,i.e. How much topology could be read from the algebra and how?

share|cite|improve this question
How is your manifold given? – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Aug 30 '13 at 3:20
For the Riemann surface question, I bet you could find a sort of multi-figure-8 in the plane (bouquet of $g$ circles), and take the function computing the distance^2 from that, in 3-space, set equal to a small value. – Allen Knutson Aug 30 '13 at 4:21
Everyone is focusing on surfaces for some reason, but clearly things become more interesting in higher dimension. Brieskorn gave us equations for the 28 exotic $7$-spheres, for example, all in $\mathbb R^{10}$. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Aug 31 '13 at 22:29
Two observations: you accepted an answer which, while interesting, does not really answer your question as it focuses on a very, very small set of manifolds. On the other hand, you editted the question into asking something new; please do not do that: it is much better to ask a new question separately, and in it reference this one. – Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Sep 2 '13 at 1:22

3 Answers 3

up vote 8 down vote accepted

It isn't too easy to find good equations for surfaces as algebraic subspaces of $\mathbb{R}^3$, but if you are willing to use $\mathbb{R}^n$ for larger $n$ then the picture is clearer. There are standard ways in algebraic geometry to produce surfaces as complex subvarieties $X\subset\mathbb{C}P^2$. If we let $U$ denote the space of $3\times 3$ hermitian matrices over $\mathbb{C}$ then we can define an embedding $j:\mathbb{C}P^2\to U$ by $$j([z])_{pq}=z_p\overline{z_q}/\sum_r|z_r|^2$$ (Equivalently, this sends a line $L<\mathbb{C}^3$ to the orthogonal projection onto $L$.) It is not hard to see that $j(X)$ is a real algebraic set in $U\simeq\mathbb{R}^9$. This generalises in an obvious way to express any complex projective variety as a real algebraic set.

share|cite|improve this answer

Speaking of compact orientable survaces, this is very simple, indeed: hyperelliptic curves in $CP^2$ given by equations $w^2=P_n(z)$, where $P$ is a rational function with $2n$ zeros and poles, all zeros and poles distinct. of degree $n$, are smooth embedded surfaces with Euler characteristic $4-2n$.

EDIT. A gap in the previous argument was pointed in the comment of BS: only for genera of the form $g=(d-1)(d-2)/2$ a smooth curve exist in $P^2$, and hyperelliptic curves usually have singular points. But they can be embedded to other spaces.

EDIT 2. Here is a way to construct a smooth compact orientable algebraic surface in $R^3$ of any genus. $(x,y,t)$ are the coordinates in $R^3$. $$t^2=(R^2-x^2-y^2)\prod_{j=1}^n((x-x_j)^2+(y-y_j)^2-r^2),$$ where $R$ is large and the discs $(x-x_j)^2+(y-y_j)^2<r^2$ are disjoint and contained in the disc of radius $R$ centered at the origin.

share|cite|improve this answer
Only genuses $(d-1)(d-2)/2$, $d\ge 1$ are smoothly embeddable in $CP^2$. Your hyperelliptic affine model has singularities at infinity. – BS. Aug 30 '13 at 13:29
And you get a variety defined over $\mathbb{C}$, not over $\mathbb{R}$. – Jérémy Blanc Aug 30 '13 at 15:55
@Jeremy Blanc: a smooth complex curve in $P^2$ is also a smooth real $2$-surface, and $P^2$ is a real algebraic variety if you forget the complex structure. – Alexandre Eremenko Aug 30 '13 at 18:40
Yes, OK, thanks for the precision. – Jérémy Blanc Aug 30 '13 at 20:41
@Alexandre : there must be some misunderstanding here. Do you say that $CP^2$ contains a smooth complex curve of genus $2$ ? What is then its degree $d$ ? You can embed it in some rational surfaces, but not in $P^2$. – BS. Aug 31 '13 at 10:43

Check out Jordan and Steiner, Compact surfaces as configuration spaces of mechanical linkages. (available for free, linked provided for convenience).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.