MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A_g$ be the moduli space of principally polarized abelian varieties and $A_g^0$ the open substack of indecomposable ones. Abstractly we know $A_g^0$ has a compactification with complement a normal crossing divisor. Is there one with a modular interpretation?

Motivation: the Torelli map $M_g \to A_g$ lands inside $A_g^0$. The map $M_g \to A_g^0$ is a closed immersion on coarse spaces and a ramified double cover of its image in the sense of stacks; this is the Torelli theorem. One can also map the space of curves of compact type into $A_g$, or the whole Deligne-Mumford compactification into the second Voronoi compactification of $A_g$, but now the Torelli theorem fails badly. I wonder if the Torelli theorem can be made to hold on some other compactification of $A_g^0$.

share|cite|improve this question
What do you mean by "indecomposable" ? – Damian Rössler Aug 14 '13 at 8:26
I mean not a product of lower-dimensional abelian varieties. They are allowed to be isogenous to such a product. – Dan Petersen Aug 14 '13 at 8:50
Why is the property of being indecomposable an open condition ? This property is equivalent to the existence of an idempotent in the endomorphism algebra of the abelian variety and I don't see why this should be a constructible (let alone open) property (sorry if I missed an obvious point). – Damian Rössler Aug 14 '13 at 21:56
Being indecomposable is also equivalent to not being in the image of any of the finitely many "gluing" maps $A_h \times A_{g-h} \to A_g$. – Dan Petersen Aug 15 '13 at 6:04
Ahh right, of course, thank you. – Damian Rössler Aug 15 '13 at 7:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.