3
$\begingroup$

Let $f: X \rightarrow Y$ be a flat morphism of locally noetherian schemes and $\varphi: \mathcal U \rightarrow \mathcal V$ a map of vector bundles (locally free sheaves of finite rank) on $X$.

I want to test when $\varphi$ is the zero map. What I have is the following information:

For each point $y \in Y$ the induced map

$\varphi_{|X_y}:\mathcal U_{|X_y} \rightarrow \mathcal V_{|X_y}$

is zero. Here, $X_y$ denotes the scheme-theoretic fiber of $y$, and the notation $(.)_{|X_y}$ means that one takes pullback along the natural map $X_y\rightarrow X$.

Is this information sufficient to conclude that $\varphi =0$ ? If not, are there additional assumptions on the schemes or on $f$ that would imply the vanishing of $\varphi$ ?

Note that I do not want to assume that the cokernel of $\varphi$ is locally free. If necessary we may assume $X$ as reduced.

Maybe to consider the special case $Y=X$ and $f=id$ can also be enlightening.

Any helpful comment on this would be highly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Consider the case that $X = Y$, $f = \mathrm{id}_X$, $\cal U = \cal V = \cal O$, and $X$ is not reduced. $\endgroup$
    – Angelo
    Aug 9, 2013 at 18:50
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Angelo, thank you for the comment. It would be nice if you could slightly elaborate it. I also think that the assumption of $X$ reduced is not bad for me, so the question remains if the claim holds for $X$ reduced (I edited the question at this point). $\endgroup$
    – Falter
    Aug 9, 2013 at 19:01
  • $\begingroup$ I think Angelo's comment dealt with the slightly different situation when you assume that the map is zero on the fibers of the two vector bundles. Then indeed $X=Y=Spec\, k[x]/(x^2)$, $\phi=x: O_X\to O_X$ is zero on the fiber i.e. after diving by $x$. $\endgroup$ Aug 10, 2013 at 0:13
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but this is indeed the question. So Angelo's example shows that the claim is false for schemes $X$ which are not reduced. The question remains if it holds for reduced $X$. $\endgroup$
    – Falter
    Aug 10, 2013 at 6:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Assume $X=Y$. Then locally the map of vector bundles is given by a matrix with entries regular functions and the question becomes: can a nonzero regular function be zero at every point? if this happens, then $X$ has an irreducible component all of whose points are non-reduced. $\endgroup$
    – rita
    Aug 10, 2013 at 9:11

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The question is local. Assume $X$ and $Y$ are affine, so $X = Spec A$, $Y = Spec B$, and $A$ is a $B$-algebra. We have a morphism $\varphi:M \to N$ of $A$-modules such that $\varphi \otimes B/{\mathfrak{m}} = 0$ for any maximal ideal ${\mathfrak{m}} \subset B$. It follows that $\varphi(M) \subset {\mathfrak{m}}N$ for all $m$, hence $\varphi(M) \subset (\cap {\mathfrak{m}})N$. The intersection of all maximal ideals is the Jacobson radical, so if $B$ is finitely generated it is the nilradical. If you assume that $B$ has no nilpotents ($Y$ is reduced) then it follows that $\varphi(M) \subset 0$, so $\varphi = 0$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You seem to use $\cap_{\mathfrak{m}} (\mathfrak{m} N) = (\cap_{\mathfrak{m}} \mathfrak{m}) N$, which fails in general. But it holds when $N$ is finitely generated free, which may be assumed here. $\endgroup$ Aug 10, 2013 at 8:32
  • $\begingroup$ I see the problem pointed out by Martin, too. But I am not sure if it is resolved by his comment: $N$ is only finitely generated free over $A$, but not over $B$. Note that the $\mathcal m$ are maximal ideals in $B$. $\endgroup$
    – Falter
    Aug 10, 2013 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ Let me also remark that from my intuition the obstacle to the claim in question should come from the non-reducedness of $X$ and not from $Y$. $\endgroup$
    – Falter
    Aug 10, 2013 at 18:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.