6
$\begingroup$

Is anything known about minimum dilatation pseudo-anosovs on non-orientable surfaces?

More specifically it is known whether the asymptotic behavior for log(minimal dilatation) is 1/genus? (The lower bound follows from the lower bound for pseudo-anosovs on orientable surfaces, but I do not know of any construction that realizes it.)

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I believe one ought to be able to construct examples with that asymptotics (although maybe not for all genus) in the same fashion as for the orientable case. Take a non-orientable fibered manifold with $b_1 >1$. The Thurston norm is defined on $H^1$, and one may take a sequence approaching an irrational point on a fibered face of the unit ball. Then McMullen's formula for the dilatation and the linearity of the Thurston norm should imply the same asymptotics. $\endgroup$
    – Ian Agol
    Aug 9, 2013 at 5:31
  • $\begingroup$ @IanAgol Thank you. This seems to answer my question once I convince myself that McMullen's formula works in the non-orientable case as well. Thurston mentions in his paper that most things about the Thurston norm carry to the non-orientable case which I can imagine, but McMullen's proof is tougher... $\endgroup$ Aug 10, 2013 at 3:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think McMullen's proof works in the non-orientable case as well. Take a pseudo-Anosov, and take a double branched cover to make the foliation orientable. Then the dilatation of the pseudo-Anosov is the maximal eigenvalue of the action on homology of this cover. McMullen points out that the eigenvalue is the maximal root of an Alexander polynomial, and for a fixed fibered face, there is a multi-variable Alexander poly. which specializes to the Alexander polys. of each cohomology class. I think all this goes through in the non-orientable case. $\endgroup$
    – Ian Agol
    Aug 10, 2013 at 3:30

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

One may construct upper bounds in the non-orientable case the same way as McMullen does in his paper (see p. 523 for a short description of his "renormalization" procedure, or Section 10).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.