MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I heard in a conference that Yau's conjecture is open for positive Chern class. I read in an article that talked about some stability conditions necessary in this case. So I want to know if this stability condition is well-determined or still conjectural. More precisely, is there any precise statement of this conjecture or is it open ended?

share|cite|improve this question
I would like to call the attention of the moderators of MO. What started as a good question and informative answer now seems to have been hijacked by (apparently) anonymous users to argue one side of a dispute. Without taking any position on that dispute, I do not feel MO is the proper place for such arguments. – Jason Starr Sep 1 '13 at 12:40
A recent article by X. Chen, S. Sun and S. Donaldson – user39400 Nov 21 '13 at 2:51
can anyone tell me the point of proving KE by stability? It seems that stability is a harder thing compared with KE but why use a complicated thing to explain an easier concept of KE? – user43004 Nov 21 '13 at 4:25
up vote 7 down vote accepted

A precise statement and proof of the relationship between stability and the existence of Calabi-Yau metrics is in:

  1. arXiv:1302.0282, Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun, Kahler-Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, III: limits as cone angle approaches 2π and completion of the main proof

  2. arXiv:1212.4714, Xiuxiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun, Kahler-Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, II: limits with cone angle less than 2 π

  3. arXiv:1211.4566, Xiu-Xiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun, Kahler-Einstein metrics on Fano manifolds, I: approximation of metrics with cone singularities

  4. arXiv:1210.7494, Xiu-Xiong Chen, Simon Donaldson, Song Sun Kahler-Einstein metrics and stability

  5. arXiv:1211.4669, Gang Tian, K-stability and Kähler-Einstein metrics

(so I understand; I haven't read all of this)

share|cite|improve this answer
It's worth noting that the above preprints prove that K-stable implies the existence of a Kahler-Einstein metric. The other direction was proven when there are no automorphisms by Donaldson (KE implies K-semistability), Stoppa (KE implies K-stability) and in the presence of automorphsims by Berman. – Ruadhaí Dervan Aug 7 '13 at 17:55
Its also worth noting that as far as I understand, Tian has also posted a preprint with these results: arXiv:1211.4669. – Otis Chodosh Aug 7 '13 at 23:30
Yes, maybe for the sake of completeness, and since moreover your answer has been accepted, you could add also Tian's contribution to the subject. Best, – diverietti Sep 2 '13 at 11:54

protected by Community Nov 21 '13 at 5:21

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.