Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Could anyone provide me some materials on the derivation of Ewald's generalized theta function (in English)? The original paper was written in German :-(

Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale

P. P. Ewald

Annalen der Physik

Volume 369, pages 253–287, 1921

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.19213690304/abstract

(DOI: 10.1002/andp.19213690304)

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

A step by step derivation of Ewald summation can be found in:

Williams, D. E. (1971). Accelerated convergence of crystal-lattice potential sums. Acta Crystallographica Section A, 27(5), 452–455. doi:10.1107/S0567739471000998

There's also an expanded version of the above paper:

Williams, D. E. (2006). Accelerated convergence treatment of $R^{-n}$ lattice sums. In U. Shmueli (Ed.), International Tables for Crystallography. Volume B. (pp. 385–397). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Some additional material that might help you:

De Leeuw, S. W., Perram, J. W., & Smith, E. R. (1980). Simulation of Electrostatic Systems in Periodic Boundary Conditions. I. Lattice Sums and Dielectric Constants. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373(1752), 27–56. doi:10.1098/rspa.1980.0135

Nijboer, B. R. A., & De Wette, F. W. (1957). On the calculation of lattice sums. Physica, 23(1-5), 309–321. doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(57)92124-9

I think between the papers of Williams and the appendices in Nijboer and De Wette, it is possible to fill all the gaps (at least in the case where there's no dipole moment).

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks! Actually I was looking for the following identity \sum_{\vec{n}} e^{-t||\vec{n}+\vec{r}||^2} = \left(\frac{\pi}{t}\right)^(\frac{3}{2}) \sum_{\vec{n}} e^{-\frac{pi^2}{t}\cdot ||\vec{n}||^2}+i\cdot 2\pi\cdot \vec{n}\cdot \vec{r}} , which is equation 3.10 in the 2nd paper you mentioned(i.e. Leeuw et. al.'s paper and they missed the summation operator on the left hand side in that equation). I was trying to find a derivation for this idenity. Do you know any other web materials related to the proof? –  Steven Jul 28 '13 at 0:27
add comment

Here you go: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewald_summation . And here are some characters to fool the retarded length police.

share|improve this answer
    
I wasn't looking for Ewald's trick for accelerating the convergence of the infinite sum (see above for my comments to mathoverflow member "jmbr"). Thanks, though! –  Steven Jul 28 '13 at 0:30
    
@Steven: the wikipedia article I pointed at is describing exactly the content of the paper you were curious about (see the reference list at the end), and the Ewald theta function arises in that context. –  Igor Rivin Jul 28 '13 at 1:08
    
Sorry, I still do not quite see the relation between the derivation in that wikipedia article and the generalized theta function identity. Are you saying replacing the delta function by an exponential function in the step where we do the Fourier transformation of the lattice function will give the proof the generalized delta-function identity? –  Steven Jul 28 '13 at 4:56
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.