Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $~f:\mathbb{C}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ be a holomorphic function vanishing at the origin, with the following properties: $$ f_{00}, ~f_{10}, ~f_{01}, ~f_{20}, ~f_{11} =0,~~f_{20} \neq 0 \qquad \text{where} \qquad f_{ij} := \frac{\partial^{i+j} f(x,y)}{\partial x^i y^j}|_{(0,0)}.$$ What this means is that at the origin, the derivative of $f$ vanishes, plus the tangent vector $ \partial_x $ is in the Kernel of the Hessian of $f$. Moreover, the Hessian is not identically zero.

Hence, we can write the Taylor expansion of $f$ as $$ f = A_0(x) + A_1(x) y + A_2(x) y^2 + \ldots, \qquad \text{where} \qquad A_2(0) \neq 0.$$ Now it is easy to see (using the fact that $A_2(0) \neq 0$ and the implicit function theorem) that one can make a change of coordinates $y = \tilde{y}+ B(x)$, so that $f$ becomes $$f = \hat{A}_0(x) + \hat{A}_2(x) \tilde{y}^2 + \ldots \qquad \text{ie} \qquad \hat{A}_1(x) =0.$$ This is an explicit procedure, ie $B(x)$ and $\hat{A}_0(x)$ can be computed as power series in $x$ and the coefficients of $x^n$ will just be some functions of the original $f_{ij}$. Suppose $$ \hat{A}_0(x) = C_k x^k + C_{k+1} x^{k+1} + \ldots $$

My question: Is the quantity $C_k$ is invariant under $y \rightarrow y+x$?

Note that under the transformation $y \rightarrow y+x$, the $f_{ij}$ are all going to change. But the precise combination that makes up $C_k$, is going to be unchanged. That is the claim.

One can explicitly check this claim for each $k$. I believe there should be some obvious reason why this is true from the way those $C_k$ were obtained. But I don't see it immediately.

I intuitively expect this to be true because of the following reason: The direction $\partial_x$ is a special direction, ie the hessian vanishes along $\partial_x$. But, there is nothing really special about the direction $\partial_y$. It belongs to the quotient space $ T\mathbb{C}^2/ < \partial_x>$ (and not the orthogonal complement with respect to some metric).

$\textbf{Not sure if relevant, but might help with the understanding:}$
The significance of these $C_k$ is that it gives us a necessary and sufficient criteria for the curve $f=0$ to have a singularity of type $A_{k-1}$ at the origin (ie it can be written as $v^2 + u^{k} =0$ after a change of coordinates). If $C_i =0$ till $i=k-1$ and $C_{k} \neq 0$ then, the curve has an $A_{k-1}$ singularity at the origin as can easily be seen by a change of coordinates.

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.