Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(T, \mu , \eta )$ a monad on the category $\mathscr{C}$ , with the usual EM (Eilenberg-Moore) adjunction $\langle F_T, U_T, \eta_Y, \epsilon_T \rangle: \mathscr{C}^T \to \mathscr{C}$ where $\mathscr{C}^T$ is the category of $T$-agebras, objects are couples $(A, a)$ where $a: T(A) \to A$ such that $a \circ \eta_A=1$, $a \circ \mu= a \circ T(a) $.

The above adjunction induce on $\mathscr{C}$ the some triple $T$, but on $\mathscr{C}^T$ there is a cotriple $(cT, \delta, \epsilon )$ with $cT(A, a)= (T(A), \mu_A)$, $\epsilon_{(A, a)}: cT(A, a) \to (A, a)$ is give by $a: T(A)\to A$, $\delta: cT(A, a) \to cT\circ cT(A, a) $ i.e. $\delta: (T(A), \mu_A) \to (TT(A), \mu_{TA})) $ is give by $T\eta_A: T(A)\to TTA$. Now a coalgebra of $cT$ is a couple $((A, a), a^1)$ where $(A, a)$ is a $T$-algebra and $a'$ is a $T$-algebra morphism $a': (A, a) \to (T(A), \mu_A)$ such that $a'\circ \epsilon_{A, a}=1 $ and $T(\eta_A)\circ a'= T(a')\circ a' $.

If $T$ come from the free groups adjunction $\langle F, U, \epsilon , \eta \rangle: Gr \to Set$ the condition $a'\circ \epsilon_{A, a}=1 $ makes me suspect that the only cotriples $((A, a), a^1)$ are free-triples (i.e. free groups).

But in the work of J. De Vries (Lecture Notes Math N.540 p.654) in Th 2.3 (p. 659) he show a monadic functor $TTG \to TopGr \times Top$

(where $TTG$ is the topological transformation groups category, $TopGr$ the topological groups category, $Top$ topological spaces category)

where the algebras of the associate monads are the topological actions $\pi: G\times X \to X$.

In Th.2.6 he considered the comonads on the algebras category as in mine initial presentation, and prove that the associated coalgebras are topological actions $\pi: G\times X \to X$ with a continuous cross section $(S, u)$.

So it seems to me that the problem is not trivial, although it come from very simple considerations, however I have not found anywhere.

We can iterate this process of iteration, what we get? What about (co)triple (co)homology? ecc.ecc.

I ask: Do you know where (if exist) I can find a study of this issue?

If not, I hope it can be useful inspiration for those who have shoulders most powerful than mine.

share|improve this question
1  
Such monads-comonads structures were studied (if i recall correctly) by Michael Barr and recently by Bart Jacobs. In some cases it is known that the process stabilizes after a finite number of iterations. I may write more on the subject later. See also the following answer: math.stackexchange.com/questions/270045/… –  Michal R. Przybylek Jul 16 '13 at 10:58
    
There are interesting adjunctions $\mathcal{A} \leftrightarrows \mathcal{B}$ that are both monadic and comonadic. For instance, take the tensor–hom adjunction between module categories induced by a faithfully flat extension of commutative rings. –  Zhen Lin Jul 16 '13 at 11:20
    
Have you looked at Applegate-Tierney, Iterated Cotriples: link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2FBFb0060440 ? –  Todd Trimble Jul 16 '13 at 13:19
    
Todd Trimble: on the iteration of triple or cotriple there is a wide spectrum of work (60 and 70), especially on the cohomology associated (J. Duskin has done a nice book on Mem.AMS). –  Buschi Sergio Jul 16 '13 at 17:39
    
(Trimble2): But what about the EM category of algebras (or coalgebras) I have not found anything, I believe this because the EM adjunction induced by a triple always induces T (the cycle closes repetitive), but if we alternate (as I described), we obtain a non-trivial iteration (I think) of structures of algebras, coalgebras of algebras, algebras of coalgebras of algebras, etc.. –  Buschi Sergio Jul 16 '13 at 17:39

1 Answer 1

To answer one question (implicitly) raised in the post, the free group functor $F: \mathbf{Set} \to \mathbf{Grp}$ is comonadic, so here the monad-comonad tower (I do not know the standard name for this, if one exists) goes from $\mathbf{Set}$ to $\mathbf{Grp}$ and then straight back to $\mathbf{Set}$.

Here is a more general theorem of this type:

  • For $T$ a monad on $\mathbf{Set}$, the free $T$-algebra functor $\mathbf{Set} \to \mathbf{Set}^T$ to the category of $T$-algebras is comonadic provided that the canonical map $T(!): T(0) \to T(1)$ in $\mathbf{Set}^T$ is a regular monomorphism and not an isomorphism.

Edit: Here are alternate hypotheses that often obtain in practice: provided that $T(1)$ is not initial in $\mathbf{Set}^T$ and the underlying set of the initial object $T(0)$ has at least one element, the algebra map $T(!)$ is a split monomorphism and therefore a regular monomorphism, whence $F: \mathbf{Set} \to \mathbf{Set}^T$ is comonadic.

This can be extracted as a consequence of proposition 6.13 (page 24) of this paper of Mesablishvili, for example.

share|improve this answer
    
TOdd Trimple: Very interesting, thank you. –  Buschi Sergio Jul 17 '13 at 8:28

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.