MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is there any purely algebraic proof of Borel-Weil-Bott theorem. I mean only techniques from Algebraic group. In each and every proof I have seen so far they use Lie group techniques and then translate to Algebraic group version. I need a proper reference which is easily readable.

Thanks in advance.

share|cite|improve this question
There is a proof by Lunts-Rosenberg on quantum analogue of Borel-weil-Bott theorem using purely algebraic or algebraic geometry(categorical geometry)way. Check out the paper: localization for quantum group – Shizhuo Zhang Mar 10 '10 at 13:42

The simplest proof of Borel-Weil-Bott that I know is due to Demazure: he has two papers in Inventiones (one in 1968 the other in 1976) on the theorem, and the second is two pages long -- it gives a simplification of his previous proof, and he uses only algebro-geometric techniques. Both papers are readable.

share|cite|improve this answer

Near the bottom of Jacob Lurie's homepage, you can find an exposition of the Borel-Weil-Bott theorem from an algebro-geometric standpoint. It is "easily readable" if you're familiar with the things like line bundles on projective varieties, semisimple algebraic groups, etc..

share|cite|improve this answer

See J.C. Jantzen "Representations of Algebraic Groups" II.5 especially II.5.5.

There you will find an algebraic proof of the result in char. 0 (probably more-or-less Demazure's proof, mentioned in another answer). And you'll find a proof of some of what remains true in positive char (due to Henning Anderson).

share|cite|improve this answer
Demazure's approach is certainly the most useful from the viewpoint of algebraic geometry in characteristic 0, but the related questions in characteristic $p>0$ remain to a large extent open and are natural follow-ups. As George indicates, Jantzen's book provides access to such questions in a unified framework. Andersen got started on his own work partly by exploring how Demazure's set-up might be adapted to characteristic $p$. But a full analogue of Bott's theorem probably requires some creative use of Kazhdan-Lusztig theory for the affine Weyl group. – Jim Humphreys Mar 22 '10 at 20:26

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.