Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This is a question that Willie Wong raised in comments after he answered my question, Surface analog of clothoid: curvatures covering $\mathbb{R}^3$. Willie's question is more interesting (and challenging) than mine, essentially requiring the curvatures to map onto $\mathbb{R}^2$ rather than only onto $\mathbb{R}$:

Is there a surface $S \subset \mathbb{R}^3$ that realizes all pairs of principal curvatures in the sense that, for every $(\kappa_1,\kappa_2) \in \mathbb{R}^2$, there is a point $p \in S$ such that the principal curvatures at $p$ are $\kappa_1$ and $\kappa_2$?

He also suggested that it might be natural to restrict to $\kappa_1 \ge \kappa_2$.

share|improve this question
    
@Igor: Thanks for the corrections! :-) –  Joseph O'Rourke Jul 12 '13 at 12:10
4  
Just call me "Conan, the grammarian" –  Igor Rivin Jul 12 '13 at 12:29
1  
I'm wondering if it ease the things to restrict to convex surfaces and nonnegative principal curvatures... –  Thomas Richard Jul 12 '13 at 13:37

2 Answers 2

Here is one view of Manfred's Angel's Curl surface, using $g(u) = e^{u^2}$:
           Clothoid2
Hopefully I've computed this correctly. I've let the parameters $u$ and $v$ range over $\pm 4$.

share|improve this answer
1  
now it remains to christen that surface; I would call it "angel's curl", but any other name is also ok with me. –  Manfred Weis Jul 13 '13 at 16:19
    
b.t.w., thanks for visualising the surface, Joseph! –  Manfred Weis Jul 13 '13 at 16:26
1  
Concerning naming, it most resembles an ancient scroll, e.g., this image or this one. But it's your surface, so you get naming rights. :-) And I like your name. I've so edited the above. –  Joseph O'Rourke Jul 13 '13 at 16:41

I had yesterday supplied an idea for the construction of such surface as an answer to Surface analog of clothoid: curvatures covering $\mathbb{R}$, however I doubt, whether my construction really generates all pairs of principal curvatures especially the pairs $(\pm\infty,\pm\infty)$, resp. $(\pm\infty,\mp\infty)$, so here is an improvement:

$$ S(u,v)=\left( \begin{array}{c} \int_0^u{sin(s^2)ds} - cos(u^2)*\frac{1}{g(u)}*\int_0^v{cos(t^2)dt}\\\ \int_0^u{cos(s^2)ds} + sin(u^2)*\frac{1}{g(u)}*\int_0^v{cos(t^2)dt}\\\ \frac{1}{g(u)}*\int_0^v{sin(t^2)dt} \end{array}\right)$$ with $g(u) > 0, g''(u) >= 0,$ and $\lim_{u\rightarrow\pm\infty}g(u) = \infty$

Explanation:

the formula without the $\frac{1}{g(u)}$ term resembles my original suggestion of generating $S(u,v)$ by combining two clothoids who's containing planes are mutually perpendicular; the first clothoid (parameterized by $u$), which acts as the master clothoid, is the standard clothoid in the $xy$-plane; the second clothoid (parameterized by $v$) is defined in a local coordinate system with its origin somewhere on the master clothoid, the positive $z$-axis yields the local "$x$-axis" and the curve-normal in that point yields the local "$y$-axis"

The problem with that approach is that, as the second clothoid's origin approaches the limit points of the master clothoid, the limit points of the second clothoid trace out a limit cycle of non-zero radius and thus not both principal curvatures can grow beyond all limits in magnitude.

This shortcoming is addressed by scaling down the second clothoid as it approaches the limit points of the master clothoid; near those limit-points the master clothoid approximately traces out circles, which in turn generates approximately toric surface parts where the second clothoid approaches its limit points. As we have elliptic, cylindric and hyperbolic point on tori, shrinking the second clothoid as it moves along the first one, generates also combinations with arbitrarily large or small principal curvatures.

It remains to check, whether the suggested surface also has points with a pair of arbitrarily small principal curvatures, i.e. pairs of curvatures that are arbitrarily close to $(-\infty,-\infty)$

share|improve this answer
    
Beautiful! It seems the small curvatures should be realized in the neighborhood of the origin... –  Joseph O'Rourke Jul 13 '13 at 15:44
    
@Joseph: my concern are not the curvatures that are small in magnitude, but rather those that approach negative infinity; I should make that more explicit as it is easily overread. –  Manfred Weis Jul 13 '13 at 16:15
    
@Manfred: Have you computed the principal curvatures of this immersion? It should not be difficult to do, but you seem to be unsure about whether the map to the principal curvatures is actually onto all pairs, so I'm wondering what the difficulty is. I haven't actually computed them myself, but I'm curious as to whether you have done so and, if so, what the result was. –  Robert Bryant Jul 14 '13 at 5:24
    
@Robert Bryant: I haven't computed the principal curvatures, therefore I had added the remark about what remains to be checked. The construction of the surface itself was more or less an educated guess, which at least serves as a starting point for finding a correct answer. –  Manfred Weis Jul 14 '13 at 5:50
    
@Joseph: your problem has kept me busy the whole week, devising alternate ways of constructing surfaces from curves. But I guess that is a different topic. –  Manfred Weis Jul 19 '13 at 20:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.