Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Given a finite dimensional (real) vector space $V$, and two non-degenerate bilinear forms $(\cdot,\cdot)_1$ and $(\cdot,\cdot)_2$, one can use a basic linear algebra argument to show that there exists a unique invertible linear map $F:V \to V$ such that $$ (F(\cdot),\cdot)_1 = (\cdot,\cdot)_2. $$ Now if we also assume that $V$ carries a representation of a group $G$, with respect to which both $(\cdot,\cdot)_1$ and $(\cdot,\cdot)_2$ are $G$-equivariant, which is to say $$ (v.g,w.g)_1 = (v,w)_1, ~~~~~~ (v.g,w.g)_2 = (v,w)_2, ~~~~~~~ \text{ for all } v,w \in V, g \in G. $$ In this case will the map $F$ always be $G$-equivariant, i.e. will we always have $$ F(v.g) = F(v).g, $$ or do there exist situations where this equality will not hold? Another way to express the question is: Given an equivariant non-degenerate bilinear form $(\cdot,\cdot)$, and an invertible equivariant map $F$, one can produce the new equivariant non-degenerate bilinear form $(F(\cdot),\cdot)$, but can all equivariant non-degenerate bilinear forms be produced in this way from $(\cdot,\cdot)$? In other words can we classify all equivariant non-degenerate bilinear forms in terms of a certain bilinear form $(\cdot,\cdot)$ and all equivariant invertible maps $L$.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

This is true: Write $(v,w)_i = \langle A_i(v),\rangle$ where $A_i:V\to V^\ast$ is invertible and $\langle\quad,\quad\rangle:V^\ast\times V \to K$ is the duality pairing. $(\quad,\quad)_i$ is $G$-invariant iff $A_i$ is $G$-equivariant, and $A_1\circ F=A_2$, or $F=A_1^{-1}\circ A_2$ is then $G$-equivariant too.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.