MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a complex variety of dimension $n$ and $D$ a smooth hypersurface.

Let $\Omega_X(logD)^*$ be the holomorphic logarithmic De Rham complex: $\omega\in \Omega_X(logD)^k$ is a form of degree $k$ on $X$, holomorphic outside $D$ and with a logarithmic pole on $D$.

I want to prove that the complex $\Omega_X(logD)^*$ is exact for degrees $k\ge 2$: here is my proof

where $D$ is defined by $\{z=0\}$, $\alpha\in \Omega_X(logD)^k$, $k\ge 2$ can be written as $\alpha=\frac{dz\wedge \beta}{z}+\gamma$, with both $\beta$ and $\gamma$ holomorphic forms which do not contain $dz$.

$d\alpha=0$ implies $\frac{dz\wedge d\beta}{z}+d\gamma=0$ and $\beta$ and $\gamma$ are closed. So by the holomorphic version of the Poincarè lemma there are holomorphic forms $\beta'$ and $\gamma'$ such that $\beta=d\beta'$ and $\gamma=d\gamma'$.

So $\alpha=d(\frac{dz\wedge \beta'}{z}+\gamma')$

Am i right? Is that so simple?

share|cite|improve this question
To be clear, you are only proving local exactness. You're argument looks fine to me, although you might need a sign on the $\beta'$ in the last formula. – Donu Arapura Jul 4 '13 at 16:04
by global exactness you mean exactness of global sections? of course not, i want to prove local exactness – Neil Fellmann Jul 4 '13 at 16:12

See Corollary 1.10 in Steenbrink "Limits of Hodge structures" (Invent. Math. 1976).

Nb. In your definition of the log de Rham complex you need to assume $\omega$ and $d\omega$ have simple poles along $D$ (take e.g. $k=0$, $\omega = 1/f$ where $f$ is a local equation for $D$).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.