MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $S$ be the spectrum of a discrete valuation ring and $f:X\rightarrow S$ be a relative projective curve with generic fiber smooth and special fiber semistable. How much differ the sheaf $R^2f_{\operatorname{et},*}\mathbb{G}_m$ (computed in the étale topology) from $R^2f_{\operatorname{Zar},*}\mathbb{G}_m$ (computed in the Zariski topology, this is zero)? If they are not the same is there a condition on $f$ to ensure that they coincide?

share|cite|improve this question
+1 for the austere efficiency of the title. – Tom LaGatta Jul 2 '13 at 7:04
up vote 4 down vote accepted

For a smooth morphism, see Grothendieck, Dix exposés, Groupe de Brauer III, Corollaire 3.2.

share|cite|improve this answer
Actually the result cited (stating that the étale one vanishes) is more general than suggested: it doesn't require that the morphism be smooth, just that $X$ be regular. Also it's worth pointing out that in characteristic zero this follows easily from the Kummer sequence and proper base change, and doesn't need $X$ to be regular; the meat of the theorem proved by Artin is the vanishing of the $p$-torsion in characteristic $p$. – Martin Bright Jul 2 '13 at 9:13

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.