MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $A$ be a complex abelian variety such that $\mathrm{End}(A)$ is strictly bigger than $\mathbb{Z}$.

Question: Is is true that $A$ is defined over $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$?

This is of course what happens for elliptic curves.

share|cite|improve this question
2  
Dear Vima, Not in general, no. E.g. if $E$ is a fixed CM elliptic curve, and $E'$ is an arbitrary elliptic curve (e.g. one one not defined over $\overline{\mathbb Q}$), then $E\times E'$ is an abelian variety not defined over $\overline{\mathbb Q}$, with extra endomorphisms. There are also many less trivial examples than this of positive dimensional families of ab. vars. with extra endomorphisms. (These are basically what PEL-type Shimura varieties are.) Regards, – Emerton Jun 28 '13 at 12:35
    
So under which conditions is that true? Is that the case if $End(A) \otimes_\mathbb{Z} \mathbb{Q}$ is a CM field of degree twice the dimension? – vima Jun 28 '13 at 12:43

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.