Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

It is known that for $SU(N)$ $$ \int \chi_{\mu_1}(UV_1)\chi_{\mu_2}(U^{-1}V_2)\, dU = \delta_{\mu_1\mu_2}\frac{\chi_{\mu_1}(V_1V_2)}{\dim(\mu_1)} $$ where $dU$ is Haar measure on $SU(N)$ normalized such that with respect to it $\operatorname{Vol}(SU(N))=1$; and $\chi_{\mu}(U)$ means the trace of $U$ in the irreducible representation $\mu$.

I came across this integral in "On quantum gauge theories in two dimensions", Edward Witten, Commun. Math. Phys. 141, 153-209 (1991).

My question is simple. What else is known about integrals on $SU(N)$ of the form $$ \int \chi_{\mu_1}(U^{\pm 1}V_1)\dots\chi_{\mu_n}(U^{\pm 1}V_n)\, dU \ ? $$

share|improve this question
    
I edited my negative answer now, and gave a rep-theoretic strategy. –  plusepsilon.de Jun 27 '13 at 9:52
    
@RicardoAndrade what was the point of adding the Haar Measure tag? the question does not really concern the details of that measure, and I find the tag rather gratuitous, representation-theory would be more apt –  Yemon Choi Jun 27 '13 at 10:01
    
@Yemon: You are correct. I apologize for the tagging error. I have replaced the tag. –  Ricardo Andrade Jun 27 '13 at 10:06
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Do the Weingarten formulas help at all? See Theorem 2.5, and the surrounding discussions, in http://arxiv.org/abs/0903.5143

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer. In Weingarten's formula all group elements in the integrand are in fundamental representation. But I don't think if I can get any more general results:) –  user10001 Jun 27 '13 at 10:36
add comment

The first formula go under the name the Schur orthogonality relations. There is a reason for this formula to be of such a nice form. It actually holds for any compact group. Could you explain why you want to consider it?

$SU(1)$ is easy. For $SU(2)$, this involves integrals of the Chebyschev polynomials. If you can't find anything useful in the usual integral tables, there is no hope to find something for any other $n$.

Edit: As a second thought, the character $\chi_{\mu_1}\cdot \chi_{\mu_2}$ equals the character $\chi_{\mu_1 \otimes \mu_2}$, where $\mu_1 \otimes \mu_2$ is the tensor product of $SU(n)$-reps. I think that Fulton-Harris' book about representation theory explains you what you get for tensoring $SU(n)$-reps, i.e., how they decompose into irreducible things. So you have to clue together those $\chi$'s with $U$ and those with $U^{-1}$, and you can use the Schur orthogonality relations.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer. I am a physics student and was considering second integral in context of a kind of generalization of two dimensional Yang Mills. I couldn't find any mathematical references considering such integrals so thought about asking here. –  user10001 Jun 27 '13 at 9:44
2  
re your comment about decomposing tensors - what, you get for SU(n), once $n\geq3$, is a mess, although I think the physicists have hacked out SU(3) quite explicitly. I think Benoit Collins may have some recent work related to asymptotic behaviour for large n –  Yemon Choi Jun 27 '13 at 9:54
    
@Marc thanks for your suggestion. I will try it out. –  user10001 Jun 27 '13 at 10:43
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.