MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose A is a covariance matrix whose diagonal elements are same, i.e. $A_{1,1}=A_{2,2}=\cdots=A_{N,N}$, can we conclude that A is full rank? Suppose the absolute values of the off-diagonal elements in A are all smaller than the diagonal elements in A. Thanks!

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Mikael de la Salle, Yemon Choi, Benjamin Steinberg, Andy Putman, Andrey Rekalo Jun 27 '13 at 6:12

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question does not appear to be about research level mathematics within the scope defined in the help center." – Mikael de la Salle, Benjamin Steinberg, Andy Putman, Andrey Rekalo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

The answer to your first question is: no, you can't conclude that, since a square matrix in which every entry is the same positive number is a rank-$1$ covariance matrix. – Michael Hardy Jun 26 '13 at 21:10
up vote 0 down vote accepted

No. Let $a,b,c,d$ be complex numbers of modulus $1$, chosen so that $a\neq c$, $b\neq d$, and $ab^*\neq cd^*$. Form the column vectors $v=(1,a,b)^T$ and $w=(1,c,d)^T$. Then the matrix $$ vv^* +ww^*=\begin{pmatrix} 2 & a^*+c^* & b^*+d^* \\ a+c & 2 & ab^*+cd^* \\ b+d & a^*b+c^*d & 2 \end{pmatrix} $$ has rank two, but all the off-diagonal entries have modulus strictly less than $2$.

EDIT: A simple example would be $$ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & \frac35 & \frac45 \\ \frac35 & 1 & 0 \\ \frac45 & 0 & 1\end{pmatrix} $$ where one can replace $(\frac35, \frac45)$ with any pair $(a,b)$ such that $|a|^2+|b|^2=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks! It is interesting. How do you see the matrix has rank 2 without calculation? How did you construct such matrix? Is there any theory behind this construction? – user2008790 Jun 27 '13 at 0:45
I've added an easy example. The original example is rank 2 because it is constructed as a sum of two rank 1 matrices. (We are probably at the point that some people would say this is more appropriate for math.stackexchange.) – Mike Jury Jun 27 '13 at 2:59

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.