7
$\begingroup$

I am sure that this is well known in the right places, but: Is the C* completion of a star nuclear Fréchet algebra a nuclear C* algebra? (Suppose that the C* norm is continuous with respect to the Fréchet topology.)

[Basic, but commutative, example to explain topology - smooth functions on a compact manifold completed to continuous functions.]

To explain more: I expect that if the result was true, all that would be needed would be that the product and star were continuous. If we take continuous seminorms $\|.\|_1 \le \|.\|_2 \le \dots$ then likely we should have $\|a\,b\|_n\le C\, \|a\|_m\,\|b\|_m$ where $m,C$ just depend on $n$. By C* completion, this would be via some star representation of the algebra on a Hilbert space $H$, so that the map from the algebra to $B(H)$ was continuous.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Could you please explain what do you understand by a C*-completion of a nuclear Frechet algebra? $\endgroup$ Jun 24, 2013 at 17:05
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Specifically, what do you mean by a nuclear Frechet algebra? (Surely more than a Frechet algebra whose underlying top. vector space is nuclear?) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Jun 24, 2013 at 17:57
  • $\begingroup$ Will try to explain above $\endgroup$ Jun 25, 2013 at 9:35
  • $\begingroup$ I'm still not entirely sure I understand the assumptions, but a possible counterexample might be a well-chosen subalgebra of the reduced group Cstar-algebra of a free group (or any other group with the rapid decay property) $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Jun 25, 2013 at 10:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I know what it means for a Frechet space to be nuclear, but I don't know what you mean when you ask for a Frechet algebra to be nuclear. $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Jun 26, 2013 at 22:14

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Counterexample.

I think the $C^\star$ algebra of the Free group on two generators $F_2$ is not a nuclear $C^\star$ algebra, same for the reduced group $C^\star$ algebra of $F_2$.

The finite support functions $c_f (F_2)$ is a dense subagebra of $C^\star(F_2)$, but is not Frechet.

Let $\ell$ be the word length of $F_2$. Let $\omega=e^\ell$, the exponentiated word length function on $F_2$. Then $\omega(gh) \leq \omega(g) \omega(h)$ for $g, h \in F_2$, and $\omega(e) = 1$.

Form rapidly vanishing complex-valued functions on $F_2$ using this "weight" $\omega$. I'll denote them by ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$, ${\cal S}$ for "Schwartz functions". There is a natural Fr'echet space topology on ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$, given by norms $\| \varphi \|_n = sup_{g \in F_2} w(g)^n |\varphi(g)|$. ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$ is naturally a Fr'echet algebra for convolution multiplication, because $\omega$ has the submultiplicative property. Also ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$ is nuclear, since the exponentiated word lenght function satisfies a summability condition $\sum_{g \in F_2} {1\over{e^{pl(g)}}} < \infty$ for some $p>0$. And ${\cal S}^e(F_2)$ is dense in the $C^\star$-algebra since it contains $c_f(F_2)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.