Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a space $A$ which is homeomorphic to the open $n$-ball $B_n$. I'm trying to build a CW-complex with it, so I want a continuous function from the closed ball $\overline{B}_n$ to the closure $\overline{A}$. The spaces I'm working with are relatively nice, they are embedded in the unit cube $(0,1)^m$ for $m\geq n$. I know that this alone is not enough, as $\sin(\frac{1}{x})$ can be shifted and shrunk into the unit square.

On the other hand, I know that if there is a uniformly continuous map from $B_n$ to $A$, then it will preserve Cauchy sequences, so it can be extended to a continuous map on the closures. Furthermore, if a continuous map exists on the closures, the restrictions to the interior has to preserve Cauchy sequences.

So my general question is, what kind of properties could I look for in $A$ that would guarantee that a uniformly continuous map exists, or at least one that preserves Cauchy sequences.

More specifically, I feel like it should work as long as $A$ has finite volume (surface volume? measure? whatever the correct generalization of arc length and surface area would be). Are there any theorems that might say something along those lines?

Edit: The open ball $B_n$ is uniformly homeomorphic to the open hypercube $(0,1)^n$. Let $F:(0,1)^n\rightarrow A$ be a homeomorphism with the property that there exists $K>0$ such that for any $i\in [n]$ and $x\in (0,1)^{n-1}$, the arc length of $f_x(t) = F(x_1,x_2,\ldots, x_{i-1},t,x_i,\ldots,x_{n-1})$ is less than $K$. Does this imply that $A$ is uniformly homeomorphic to $B_n$?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

In three dimensions, merely having finite volume and surface area isn't enough. You could start with something like the helix $(\cos t, \sin t, 1/t)$ for $1 \leq t < \infty$ and then thicken it to get a topological ball, but if the amount of thickening dies off fast enough as $t \to \infty$ then I think both volume and surface area can be finite.

share|improve this answer
    
Hmm, that's a nice counterexample. What if we include a uniform bound on being connected locally, something like: there exists $\epsilon>0$ such that for all $x\in A$, the intersection of $A$ and the $\epsilon$-ball around $x$ is connected. It seems like that condition might even imply the finite volume. –  David Collins Jun 24 '13 at 21:59
    
No, I don't think that's quite right. I think I mean there exists $\epsilon>0$ such that for every $\delta$ with $0<\delta<\epsilon$ and for every $x\in A$, the intersection of $A$ with the $\delta$ ball around $x$ is connected. –  David Collins Jun 25 '13 at 15:58
    
Nope, I think I'm missing the point. It's not that it gets close together, it's that some part of it is infinitely long. –  David Collins Jun 25 '13 at 16:56
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.