MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Assume that $G$ is a compact Lie group and $M$ is a smooth oriented manifold on which $G$ acts freely. Then the orbit space $M/G$ is a smooth manifold with dimension $dimM-dimG$. In general $M/G$ may be unoriented, so when $M/G$ can be an oriented manifold?

share|cite|improve this question
Have you seen the argument that a Lie group is orientable? – Ryan Budney Jun 19 '13 at 10:39
Sorry, I do not know whether the orientation of the Lie group is need here. – yangxiangdong Jun 19 '13 at 14:42

Choose a $G$-invariant Riemannian metric on $M$. For any $x\in M$ let $U_x$ be the tangent space to the orbit $Gx$ at $x$, and let $V_x$ denote the orthogonal complement of $U_x$ in $T_xM$. As the action is free, $U_x$ is canonically identified with the Lie algebra $LG$. The spaces $V_x$ give a subbundle of $TM$. Let $p:M\to M/G$ be the projection. For $y\in M/G$, let $W_y$ be the set of equivariant sections of $V|{p^{-1}\{y\}}$. As $p^{-1}\{y\}$ is a free $G$-orbit, we have natural identifications $W_y\simeq V_x$ for all $x\in p^{-1}\{y\}$. It is also not hard to see that $W$ is the tangent bundle for $M/G$. (You have to do most of this work to make $M/G$ a manifold in the first place.) Put $n=\dim(M)$ and $d=\dim(G)$. It now follows that sections of $\Lambda^{n-d}(T(M/G))$ biject with $G$-invariant sections of $\Lambda^{n-d}(V)$. If we pick a nonzero element $u$ in the space $\Lambda^d(LG)\simeq\mathbb{R}$ then multiplication by $u$ gives a $G$-equivariant isomorphism $$ \Lambda^{n-d}(V) \to \Lambda^n(LG\oplus V) = \Lambda^n(TM). $$ Thus, orientations of $M/G$ biject with $G$-invariant orientations of $M$ (but the bijection depends on the sign of $u$, or in other words the orientation of $LG$).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your clear answer. – yangxiangdong Jun 19 '13 at 14:43
@NeilStrickland I am afraid that the statement is incorrect, as one can see, for example, in the existence of non-orientable homogenous spaces. The problem in your argument is that G might act non trivially on LG hence the action might be orientation preserving on TM but not on V. The identification of U with LG is not canonical as well, since it depends on the choice of x. – Haggai Tene Jun 30 '14 at 8:01

Let's suppose that $M$ is connected. Then $M/G$ is orientable if and only if $G$ preserves orientations on $M$. As the action of $G$ on the two possible orientations induces a continuous homomorphism $G\to \{\pm 1\}$, we infer that $M/G$ is orientable if $G$ is connected, for instance.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.