MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $X$ is a smooth projective complete intersection contained in the product $\mathbb{P}^n \times \mathbb{P}^m$, and call $X_n$ and $X_m$ the images of $X$ inside $\mathbb{P}^n$ and $\mathbb{P}^m$ via the two natural projections. Suppose moreover that I have the two Koszul complexes of $X_n\subset \mathbb{P}^n$ and $X_m\subset \mathbb{P}^m$. Can I reconstruct the Koszul complex of $X$? Under what hypotheses?

share|cite|improve this question
What is the Koszul complex of a subvariety that is not a complete intersection? – Jack Huizenga Jun 13 '13 at 16:14
@Jack Huizenga: How do you define the Koszul complex? In most instances, it is defined for an arbitrary system of elements in an algebra, and is acyclic iff the corresponding subvariety is a complete intersection... – Vladimir Dotsenko Jun 15 '13 at 10:26
up vote 1 down vote accepted

In general, you can't. By taking quotients, knowing the Koszul complex of $X$ tells you $X$. But there are many subvarieties of $X_n \times X_m$ that project surjectively onto $X_n$ and $X_m$. If $X_n$ and $X_m$ are both positive-dimensional, then the intersection of $X_n \times X_m$ with any hypersurface of bidegree $(a,b)$ for $a>0$ and $b>0$ will map surjectively onto $X_n$ and $X_m$, since by intersection theory its intersection with $pt \times X_m$ and $X_n \times pt$ is nontrivial.

One additional assumption that works is to assume that $X_n$ or $X_m$ is a point. But this seems silly! The most reasonable additional assumption I can come up with is that $X = X_n \times X_m$. There are other lists of assumptions that also give a unique $X$, but those just seem contrived. For instance, you could assume that the projections $X \to X_n$ and $X \to X_m$ are isomorphisms, and that $X$ has no automorphisms, but you are unlikely to get a nice description of the Koszul complex.

For $X = X_n \times X_m$, there is a nice description of the complex. Since we get a set of generators for the ideal of $X_n \times X_m$ by taking the union of a set of generators of $X_n$ and a set of generators of $X_m$, you get the Koszul complex by just tensoring the Koszul complexes of $X_n$ and $X_m$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.