MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I read that $O(M)$ is connected if and only if $M$ is not orientable. Is it true? If there is an answer, I would very much like to see a proof. Thank you.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 6 down vote accepted

If you assume that $M$ itself is connected, then it is true.

First, if $M$ is orientable and connected, then $O(M)$ has (at least) two connected components, one for each orientation of frame, either agreeing with a specified orientation or not.

If $M$ is not orientable, then, using the Levi-Civita connection for the Riemannian metric and parallel translating a frame around a non-orientable loop in the manifold will show that any two frames at a point can be connected, since the orthogonal group in any dimension has exactly two components. Then any two fibers of $O(M)\to M$ can be connected since $M$ is connected, so it follows that $O(M)$ itself is connected.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry,I forgot to mention that M is connected. I was quite surprised because by using a connection one can connect 2 points in the bundle by lifting the curve connecting the projections(of course,only differentiable curves can be lifted) so I do not understand where this reasoning is fallacious. Anyway,thank you very much for your answer,Mr. Bryant,it was most useful. – Codan Acelaire Jun 13 '13 at 15:01
OK,now I understand.The problem consists in connecting frames over the same point,and it can be done if M is not orientable. – Codan Acelaire Jun 13 '13 at 15:59

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.