MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Probably this is known, but mathworld and wolfram alpha don't recognize this potential identities.

Numerical evidence suggests:

$$ \sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{\zeta(n)}{a^n} =? \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{a (a n^2 -n) } = \frac{-\gamma - \psi((a-1)/a)}{a} \qquad (1) $$


$$ \sum_{n=2}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n \zeta(n)}{a^n} =? \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{a (a n^2 + n) } = \frac{\gamma + \psi(1/a)+a}{a} $$

for $a \in \mathbb{C}$ whenever the first sum converges.

Web search found the special case $a=2$ is proved in a paper.

Are these identities true?

mathworld 52 gives related identity for even zeta:

$$ \sum_{n=0}^\infty\zeta(2n+2) x^{2n}=\frac{1-\pi x \cot(\pi x)}{2 x^2} \qquad (52) $$

Setting $a=\pi$ in (1) and $x=1/\pi$ in (52) gives: $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\zeta(2n+1)/\pi^{2n+1} = (-\gamma -\psi((\pi-1)/\pi)/\pi - (1-\cot(1))/2 $$

Verified with mpmath.nsum and $1000$ digits of precision.

share|cite|improve this question
The first two formulas (question marks) are easy to prove by expanding the Riemann zeta-function into its definition, changing the summation order and using the formula for a geometric series. – Johan Andersson Jun 12 '13 at 9:16
Thank you Johan. – joro Jun 12 '13 at 10:49
But of course absolute convergence must be checked to reverse the order of summation. Not hard. – Gerald Edgar Jun 12 '13 at 13:30

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.