Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The torus $\mathbb{T}^n$, the sphere $\mathbb{S}^n$ and the hyperbolic space $\mathbb{H}^n$ admit metrics of constant (sectional) curvature $0, 1, -1$ respectively. Do they afford metrics of constant curvature in $\{0, 1, -1\}$ for a different value? (e.g. does the torus admit a metric of curvature $-1$, or $1$?)

In the 2-dimensional case, the Gauss-Bonnet theorem answers the question negatively, but what about higher dimensions?

share|improve this question
    
It is a standard result in Riemannian geometry that if you have $M$ with constant sectional curvature $k$ then there is a Riemannian covering map from $M_k\ to M$, where $M_k$ is the sphere, Euclidean space or hyperbolic space. Some topology should finish the proof that the answer is negative. –  Otis Chodosh Jun 7 '13 at 2:57
    
Sorry, to clarify, $M_k$ is the model with constant curvature $k$ (i.e. in your list, except Euclidean space rather than the torus, because its simply connected) –  Otis Chodosh Jun 7 '13 at 2:58
1  
Unless I am very much mistaken, hyperbolic space $\mathbb H^n$ is diffeomorphic to euclidean space $\mathbb E^n$. The former is modeled as the half space $\mathbb R_{>0} \times \mathbb R^{n-1}$ with metric scaling as $x_1^{-2}$, where $x_1$ is the first coordinate; the diffeomorphism is $x_1 \mapsto \log x_1$. –  Theo Johnson-Freyd Jun 7 '13 at 4:44
    
Thats true: one hyperbolic model is $\frac{dr^2}{1+r^2} + r^2 g_{S^{n-1}}$. This works in dimension $2$-by the way. –  Otis Chodosh Jun 7 '13 at 5:26
    
So, sorry (I was distracted by the replacement of euclidean space by the torus) the answer should be that of your list, only hyperbolic space admits a constant sectional curvature metric of the other kind. The others do not. If you had euclidean space instead of the torus, this would also admit a hyperbolic metric. I think this answers the question. Nothing is different in dimension 2 vs higher dimensions for this question. –  Otis Chodosh Jun 7 '13 at 5:29
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The right thing to do is to restrict to compact manifolds of dimension $n\ge 2$. Then the answer is: If $M$ admits a metric of (possibly variable) sectional curvature $K<0$, or $K=0$ or $K>0$, then it does not admit a metric of curvature $K'$ with $K'<0, K'=0$ of $K'>0$, unless $KK'>0$ or $K=K'=0$.

The proof is elementary Riemannian geometry, most of which you can find, say, in do Carmo's book "Riemannian geometry". For instance, it follows from Cartan-Hadamard theorem that a manifold with metric of nonpositive curvature has contractible universal cover. This takes care of $K>0$ (and $K'>0$).

Consider a manifold $M$ admitting a flat metric. Then $\pi_1(M)$ contains $Z^2$, since $M$ is covered by the $n$-torus. On the other hand, fundamental groups of compact manifolds of negative curvature cannot contain $Z^2$. Hence, you cannot have a compact manifold which admits both a flat metric and a metric of negative curvature. Actually, a bit more follows from the flat torus theorem: Every metric of nonpositive curvature on the $n$-torus has to be flat.

share|improve this answer
    
For $K>0$ you could have cited the Mayer-Vietoris theorem to justify that the universal cover of $M$ is not contractible. In the other cases, the growth of fundamental group seems a bit more elementary to me than the inclusion of $\mathbb{Z}^2$. –  Benoît Kloeckner Jun 7 '13 at 9:13
    
@Benoît: True on both; when I started typing the answer, I first referred to Meyer's theorem, but then somehow settled on Cartan-Hadamard. For growth: I tried to restrict to proofs for which one reference (do Carmo) sufficed. –  Misha Jun 7 '13 at 12:11
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.