Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose that $X$ is a compact, finite dimensional manifold and $Y$ is an infinite dimensional, second countable ($C^\infty$-)Banach manifold. Let $\nu \in \mathbb{N}$.

Question: Is the space $C^\nu(X,Y)$ a ($C^\infty$ or $C^k$ for some $k \in \mathbb{N}$) Banach manifold which is Lindelöf (i.e. every open cover has a countable subcover)?

Any help, as well as references are very much appreciated.


Some motivation:
My goal is to apply a parametric transversality theorem, where my parameter space is $C^\nu(X,Y)$. In order to so it is required that the parameter space is Lindelöf and a ($C^k$-) Banach manifold. I don't have much experience with function spaces and their topology, especially when the target is infinite dimensional. So I apologize if it turns out that my question is "well known".

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

See the paper

  • MR0226681 (37 #2268) Elĭasson, Halldór I. Geometry of manifolds of maps. J. Differential Geometry 1 1967 169–194.

for a description of the manifold structure on $C^\nu(X,Y)$. But you need somthing like a Riemannian exponential mapping on $Y$ which is a diffeomorphism from a neighborhood of the 0-section in $TY$ to a neighborhood of the diagonal in $Y\times Y$; you can forget some properties of the exponential mapping, then this is called a local addition (see here). If $Y$ is nice enough (smoothly paracompact or at least $C^1$-paracompact allows to construct a linear connection on $TY$; or you may be given a linear connection on $TY$) then you have this.

Edit:

If $X$ is compact and $Y$ is a separable Banach space (added in second edit), then $C^\nu(X,Y)$ is separable; In fact it is $C^\nu(X)\hat{\hat\otimes} Y$ for the completed inductive tensor product. (see here, e.g) Then it is obvious that the tensor product is separable.

Second edit: About $C^k$-mapping manifolds.

In "Kriegl, Michor: The convenient setting ..." (see my homepage) 14.11.1 states that there does not exist any Frechet differentiable bump function. You can embed an interval in any manifold, thus $C^0(M)$ does not admit differentiable bump functions. Furthermore, $C^0$ sits at the top of $C^k(M)$, so also $C^k(M)$ does not admit differentiable bump functions. On the other hand, $C^\infty(M)$ is nuclear Frechet, so has smooth partitions of unity. This is the reason why I vastly prefer $C^\infty$, and Sobolev completions, if I have to solve equations.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you very much for your answer and the references! From your answer I gather that the existence of such a local addition is not a very restrictive condition on $Y$, is this correct? Do you know if $C^\nu(X,Y)$ is a Lindelöf space (or second countable)? –  Dave Jun 5 '13 at 15:12
    
@Peter Michor: Thank you for the edit. Although I don't understand why it is true, I'm very glad to hear that $C^\nu(X,Y)$ is separable if $X$ is compact and $Y$ is separable! I'd appreciate it very much if you could explain in some more detail why this is in fact true (or point me to a reference). Unfortunately I don't know what the "completed inductive tensor product" is (and I didn't find much about it on the internet...). Thank you for your help. –  Dave Jun 7 '13 at 15:45
    
@Dave Hartman: What is your Banach manifold $Y$. Is it an open set in a Banach space? –  Peter Michor Jun 12 '13 at 9:41
    
@Peter Michor: Thank you for the additional reference. Yes, $Y$ is an open set in a Banach space. In fact, $Y=\mathbb{R}^2\times F_2(Gvect(f))$ which is an open set in $\mathbb{R}^2\times G_1^2$. $G_1$ is the space from your answer here: mathoverflow.net/questions/127843/… . But I consider $G_1$ with the $C^k$ (instead of $C^\infty$) topology so that it is a Banach space (instead of a Fréchet space). –  Dave Jun 12 '13 at 21:21
    
@Peter Michor: Thank you for elaborating. Are smooth bump functions necessary in order to get a local addition? Does my space $Y$ admit a local addition? –  Dave Jun 17 '13 at 5:53

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.