Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ be positively graded Lie algebra over $\mathbb{Q}$, concentrated in even degrees.

Question: If $\mathfrak{g}$ is not free, must there exist linearly independent elements $a,b\in\mathfrak{g}$ such that $[a,b]=0$?

share|improve this question
    
The Yang-Mills Lie algebra $\mathfrak{y}\mathfrak{m}(2)$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ has a grading concentrated in even degrees. It is isomorphic to the rational Heisenberg Lie algebra $h_1$ with basis $(e_1,e_2,e_3)$ and $[e_1,e_3]=[e_2,e_3]=0, [e_1,e_2]=e_3$. Did I misunderstand something ? –  Dietrich Burde Jun 4 '13 at 11:38
    
@Dietrich: Perhaps. I changed one word to make the question clearer. –  Mark Grant Jun 4 '13 at 11:43
1  
@Mark, I see. If $\mathfrak{g}$ is finite-dimensional, then it is nilpotent by Jacobson's theorem, and we may take a nonzero element $a\in Z(\mathfrak{g})$ and any $b$ with $a$ and $b$ linearly independent to obtain $[a,b]=0$. –  Dietrich Burde Jun 4 '13 at 11:53
    
@Dietrich: yes, thanks. I should have mentioned that we assume that $\mathfrak{g}$ is infinite-dimensional. –  Mark Grant Jun 4 '13 at 12:32

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Consider the complex Lie algebra $\mathfrak{h}=\mathbb{C}[t,t^{-1}]\partial_t$ with Lie bracket $$[t^m\partial_t,t^n\partial_t]=(n-m)t^{n+m-1}\partial_t$$ ie the natural bracket that arises considering the natural action of $\mathfrak{h}$ on $\mathbb{C}[t,t^{-1}]$ by derivations. This is known as the Witt algebra. If we give $t^n\partial_t$ degree $n-1$ then this is a $\mathbb{Z}$-graded Lie algebra.

I claim that the $\mathbb{Q}$-Lie-subalgebra $\mathfrak{g}$ of $\mathfrak{h}$ spanned by the elements $t^n\partial_t$ with $n\geq 3$ and odd does not contain linearly independent elements $a,b$ such that $[a,b]=0$. Indeed $\mathfrak{h}$ does not.

Suppose $a=\sum_{i\leq n}\lambda_it^i\partial_t$ and $b=\sum_{j\leq n}\mu_jt^j\partial_t$ are linearly independent with $[a,b]=0$. We can assume WLOG that $\lambda_n=1$. Suppose that $m\leq n$ is the largest number such that $\mu_m\neq 0$. Then the degree ${n+m-2}$ piece of $[a,b]$ is simultaneously $\mu_m (n-m)$ and $0$. Thus $m=n$ and by rescaling $b$ we may assume $\mu_n=1$.

Since $a\neq b$ we may now find $k$ maximal such that $\lambda_k\neq \mu_k$. Write $a=a_1+a_2$ and $b=b_1+b_2$ with $a_1,b_1$ a sum of homogenous terms of degree less than $k$ and $a_2=b_2$ a sum of homogenous terms at least $k$. Then $$0=[a,b]=[a_1,b_1]+[a_2,b_1]+[a_1,b_2]+[b_2,a_2]=[a_1,b_1]+[a_2,b_1-a_1].$$

The leading term of $[a_1,b_1]$ has degree at most $(2k-2)$ and the leading term of $[a_2,b_1-a_1]$ is $(\mu_k-\lambda_k)(n-k)t^{n+k-1}\partial_t$ which has degree $n+k-2$ and so we obtain the desired contradiction.

It is straightforward to verify that $\mathfrak{g}$ is not free.

share|improve this answer
    
@Simon: Thanks for this. Are you missing a "not" from your second paragraph? In which case, is this giving an example of a non free Lie algebra for which all brackets of linearly independent elements are nonzero? –  Mark Grant Jun 4 '13 at 12:54
    
In line $5$ it should be "I claim that ... does not contain", I think. –  Dietrich Burde Jun 4 '13 at 12:57
    
Yes. That's right. I'll change it. –  Simon Wadsley Jun 4 '13 at 13:03
    
If positively graded means non-negatively graded then $n\geq 3$ can be replaced by $n\geq 1$. –  Simon Wadsley Jun 4 '13 at 13:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.