MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Peano is typically credited with giving the first abstract definition of a vector space (1888):

Apparently, Peano credits Möbius, Grassmann, and Hamilton for inspiring the idea. However, I recall reading somewhere that there was an earlier and independent definition, not mentioned by Peano. (Maybe it was Dedekind?)

Does anyone know what I'm talking about?

share|cite|improve this question
@Drew: I usually use the html characters ä (ä), ë (ë), ï (ï), ö (ö), ü (ü) for umlauts. These will work in questions and answers, but apparently not in comments. Alternatively, you can just input ä, ë, ï, ö, ü directly (if you are able to input those; otherwise, you can copy and paste from somewhere else), and that should work in questions, answers, and comments on mathoverflow. – Ricardo Andrade Jun 1 '13 at 23:50
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Before Peano (1888), a more limited notion of vector space over the reals was axiomatized by Gaston Darboux (1875), in Sur la composition des forces en statiques.

This early history is discussed by Gregory Moore, The axiomatization of linear algebra: 1875-1940

An earlier approach to axiomatizing vectors emerged from the work of Gaston Darboux. In 1875 he published an article analyzing various proofs of the composition of forces in statics (i.e., the parallelogram law), beginning with one due to Daniel Bernoulli in 1726. Darboux set himself the task of treating this matter in pure geometry and then determining which assumptions are necessary.

share|cite|improve this answer
Very interesting. I would be curious then to learn what is Darboux' "more limited notion". – Pietro Majer Jun 2 '13 at 13:08
@Carlos: Thanks. That paper of Gregory Moore is extremely helpful. – Drew Armstrong Jun 3 '13 at 16:11
P.S. I believe I was mistakenly thinking of Weyl's (1918) <b>re-discovery</b> when I asked the question. I still don't remember where I read about it... – Drew Armstrong Jun 3 '13 at 16:14

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.