# fixedpoint or fixed point or fixed-point

I am unsure which is the right spelling (if there even is a ‘right’ spelling), but maybe native speakers can enlighten me: When should I use

• fixed point
• fixed-point
• fixedpoint

when I refer to the point itself, but also in composite works (“fixed point equation”, “fixed-point juggling”, “fixed-point operator”)?

And do the same rules apply to prefixed points?

-
When it is a phrasal adjective you use a hyphen. So when it modifies a noun uses a hyphen: fixed−point equation, fixed−point operator, fixed−point theory. But, on the other hand, take a fixed point of the operator, consider the fixed point in $X$. We have found our fixed point. When the phrasal adjective ends with -ly, drop the hyphen, the -ly is your separator. So perfectly separated set... Fixedpoint is ugly (never use it). – Rabee Tourky May 22 '13 at 9:44
Thanks! Could you turn that into an answer, as I’d like to accept it? – Joachim Breitner May 22 '13 at 10:42
The underlying rule here is that you only need to hyphenate noun phrases that are being used adjectivally. Not doing so can lead to confusion - does the phrase 'fixed point theory' refer to a theory of fixed points or a fixed theory of points? – HJRW May 22 '13 at 14:21

## 1 Answer

When it is a phrasal adjective you use a hyphen.

So when it modifies a noun uses a hyphen: fixed−point equation, fixed−point operator, fixed-point theory.

But, on the other hand, take a fixed point of the operator, consider the fixed point in X. We have found our fixed point.

When the phrasal adjective ends with -ly, drop the hyphen, the -ly is your separator. So perfectly separated set

... Fixedpoint is ugly (never use it).

-
Except that you should really do as you say and use a hyphen (fixed-point, U+002D, TeX: -), not a minus sign (fixed−point, U+2212, TeX: dollar-dollar). – Emil Jeřábek May 22 '13 at 11:45
So the answer originally began as follows. If $(F_1,F_2)$ is an ordered pair modifying the noun $N$, then we write $F_1-F_2$ $N$. But then I thought that was being too cute, so I cut and pasted... – Rabee Tourky May 22 '13 at 13:09
This is exactly right. Even native speakers get it wrong all too often. – Lubin May 22 '13 at 13:19
@Lubin There's no such thing as right or wrong in language. If you feel native speakers get something "wrong" too often, it's either that a significant minority speaks/writes in a way you don't like or that it's your language use that is different from the norm. This is how descriptive grammar works. Of course, if you're talking about a specific "style," there is the right way. But then, whether the writer is a native speaker doesn't matter. Anyone can adopt any standard style. – Yuichiro Fujiwara May 22 '13 at 14:41
As noted above, this is very nearly correct but not quite. (Acknowledging Yuichiro's objections, let me modify that as follows: this advice will lead to unnecessary hyphenation in certain cases, and many writers regard hyphenation as ugly and to be used sparingly.) Ambiguity is only a problem when the adjectival phrase is a noun phrase; if it isn't, the hyphenation shouldn't be necessary. The '-ly' exception is trying to get at this, but is really just an ugly hack that doesn't quite get at the underlying point. 'Well tempered clavier' is a nice example. – HJRW May 23 '13 at 11:05