Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a sympletic manifold and $A\in H_2(X;\mathbb{Q})$. Let $g$ and $k$ be nonnegative integers. Assume that $$\mathcal{M}_{g,k}(X;A)$$

is dense in


Are the primary Gromov-Witten invariants corresponding to $X$ and $A$ enumerative?

If not, when does the condition $$\mathcal{M}_{g,k}(X;A)$$

dense in


imply that the corresponding primary Gromov-Witten invariants are enumerative?

share|cite|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I am not sure what "primary" means. However, I believe the answer to your first question is "no". For a sufficiently general quintic hypersurface $X$ in $\mathbb{C}P^4$, for sufficiently small curve classes $A$, all genus $0$ curves in $X$ of class $A$ are pairwise disjoint and smooth with normal bundle $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}(-1)\oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^1}(-1)$. This implies that the moduli space $\mathcal{M}_{0,k}(X;A)$ are dense in the compactified moduli spaces $\overline{\mathcal{M}}_{0,k}(X;A)$. Nonetheless, the corresponding Gromov-Witten invariants are fractions, thus not enumerative. The issue is that some of the connected components of $\mathcal{M}_{0,k}(X;A)$ have dimension that is larger than the "expected dimension", essentially because they parameterize multiple covers of embedded, smooth curves. Once one takes this into account via the multiple-covering formula, the corresponding instanton numbers are expected to be integers and enumerative (although, of course, the degree $10$ curves of Vainsencher - Pandharipande contradict enumerativity even of these instanton numbers). All of this is discussed in Cox-Katz, Example, pp. 205-206.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.