Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I develop an application in which i constantly get samples of heart pulse.

I defined an interval of t seconds.

In each t seconds I have n samples.

In every interval, I want to calculate the tendency of those n samples. For example, lets say I have n = 5, and I have samples with values {70, 88, 95, 103, 115}. I want to recognize I have a growth in the heart pulse, and I want to have some measure for the rate of grows/decrease/almost no change.

I thought on two approaches for solving this problem.

  1. I calculate the linear approximation for the n samples using linear regression by applying least squares implemented by the normal equations. (I treat each sample as two coordinates vector with x coordinate as time and y coordinate as heart pulse). I get from the normal equations a linear function of the form y = mx+b and my measure for the tendency is the slope, i.e. the m value.

  2. The second approach is to calculate the correlation (pearson's correlation) between vector x and vector y when x is the time and y is the heart pulse.

I'm asking which approach do you think is better for my problem (determining the tendency of heart pulses). Or, do you have a better algorithm for solving this problem?

share|improve this question
These are pretty close to the same thing -- the beta coefficient from the regression can be written in terms of the correlation -- so there's not much to choose from. The question of what makes a good model for your application depends on your application. I would have to think there's a large medical literature on modelling normal and abnormal heart behavior, so I suggest looking there. –  arsmath May 18 '13 at 7:36
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.